Writing 101 challenged me to grow in such a way that I did not know was possible. I have grown up in an educational system that is strictly supposed to follow a format and guideline to earn a simple grade. The structure I grew up with did not focus on quality and depth of writing. I have always felt very aware of the fact that I was not able to develop my own writing personality when it came to school work. This was a major reality check especially after participating in writing 101. I came to Puget Sound Early College eager to learn with a motivational attitude. Because I was willing to learn, I was able to see many strengths and weaknesses within my ability to write. Throughout the quarter, I have come to a point of accomplishment with what I have learned and although there were some difficult challenges, every moment was definitely worth it. Today I am more confident when using my writing skills and it will be shown as I express my strengths and weaknesses from two pieces of my writing: Bacon's Rebellion and My Writing Philosophy.
In October, our class turned in Essay #1 about Bacon's Rebellion. The end result of this essay pointed out more of my weaknesses than strengths. My initial reaction was discouragement because I put a lot of hard work into this essay with it's planning and several rough drafts. After looking at my graded rubric, I realized why I received the score that I did. I took advantage of my weak points from my essay so I could learn from them. Having a strong voice in our pieces of writing was something that was taught as very important and needed in Writing 101. I did not apply a clear voice to my essay and when my tone was there, it was quite vague. For Example, the first two sentences of my essay are "The time period in which Bacon's Rebellion occurred was a compelling moment in history. This is true no matter what angle it is looked upon." I started out the essay poorly with a faint protest of truth. Every situation in life is looked at from many angles so I was not proving anything strong by stating that in my essay. Writing 101 is the first place I learned to use my voice as a significant part of writing and because of this, I feel that the more practice I had, the more my voice was heard in my writing towards the end of the quarter. Engaging the audience in our essays is another fundamental point when writing. This is something I learned to acquire over the quarter because this was also a technique that was not familiar to me before taking this class. The essay on Bacon's Rebellion was my first essay in Writing 101, so engaging the audience was something I also did inadequately on.
At the beginning of the school year, one of the first assignments given to us was to write about our personal writing philosophy. At this point, we were new to this class so the first couple of assignments were to be written as free style. I have to admit that I over analyzed and did not believe that there were no strict rules to follow as we wrote. I followed directions anyway and wrote everything without worrying about having to follow unsparing commands. This was very enjoyable to write and I felt like I was not only writing from my mind, but I was also writing from my heart. An important point from My Writing Philosophy is "Writing is giving and receiving information that you can be compelled to share with others; whether it be emotional, intellectual, or spiritual" This is an important part to me because when writing this essay, I truly meant everything that I wrote, I was not just writing down nonsense in order to receive a simple grade. After writing about my philosophy, I know that I can carry these truths into any writing style which is something that is beneficial and powerful.
Looking back on Writing 101, I definitely know that it was a great learning experience in my life. Coming into this class, I did not know exactly what I was going to overcome and learn. Writing at a college level was an adventure for me and I am looking forward to using the skills I achieved and earned for my future pieces of writing.
Thursday, December 11, 2008
My Writing Philosophy - Portfolio
What is My Writing Philosophy?
I personally feel like I have not been able to grasp the full ability of my writing philosophy just yet. I feel like I have so much to learn about my writing philosophy and I am really looking forward to it. There is a part of a definition of the word philosophy that states "the critical study of the basic principles and concepts of a particular branch of knowledge, especially with a view to improving or reconstituting them". This really intrigues me because I have always thought of ways of improvement, ways of strengthening my writing skills. Writing is a long journey because there is always room for improvement.
Writing is a form of art and it opens up imagination and ideas that you are able to put to paper. When we post our assignments for writing class on the blogger website, it shows a form of art as we express the aptitude of our intelligence. We are able to go in depth to any extent we desire and while accomplishing this, anyone from all over the world has access to read what we post on our websites. The thought of that amazes me and it is a great experience to be apart of.
My personal experience with my Writing Philosophy is very significant. Growing up, I didn't always have an emotionally stable household. When I was younger and experiencing these family issues, my natural instinct was to hide it away in a journal, to put my deepest feelings and secrets to paper. I wrote in journals for years about almost everything. Writing develops a better understanding from many angles. When my father had found my journals and mischievously read through them, he was able to relate to me better, knowing what was going through my head and how I felt about the same issues that he was going through as well. When writing, it can develop understanding for both the author and the audience and that is exactly what was accomplished between my dad and I.
Once I started realizing my writing philosophy, I experienced self growth as well as self actualization. I say this because everyone has a million thoughts running through their heads and when you write, you are able to embrace some of those intense thoughts and it is a fascinating experience. Writing is giving and receiving information that you can be compelled to share with others; whether it is emotional, intellectual, or spiritual. Writing is a world of its own.
I personally feel like I have not been able to grasp the full ability of my writing philosophy just yet. I feel like I have so much to learn about my writing philosophy and I am really looking forward to it. There is a part of a definition of the word philosophy that states "the critical study of the basic principles and concepts of a particular branch of knowledge, especially with a view to improving or reconstituting them". This really intrigues me because I have always thought of ways of improvement, ways of strengthening my writing skills. Writing is a long journey because there is always room for improvement.
Writing is a form of art and it opens up imagination and ideas that you are able to put to paper. When we post our assignments for writing class on the blogger website, it shows a form of art as we express the aptitude of our intelligence. We are able to go in depth to any extent we desire and while accomplishing this, anyone from all over the world has access to read what we post on our websites. The thought of that amazes me and it is a great experience to be apart of.
My personal experience with my Writing Philosophy is very significant. Growing up, I didn't always have an emotionally stable household. When I was younger and experiencing these family issues, my natural instinct was to hide it away in a journal, to put my deepest feelings and secrets to paper. I wrote in journals for years about almost everything. Writing develops a better understanding from many angles. When my father had found my journals and mischievously read through them, he was able to relate to me better, knowing what was going through my head and how I felt about the same issues that he was going through as well. When writing, it can develop understanding for both the author and the audience and that is exactly what was accomplished between my dad and I.
Once I started realizing my writing philosophy, I experienced self growth as well as self actualization. I say this because everyone has a million thoughts running through their heads and when you write, you are able to embrace some of those intense thoughts and it is a fascinating experience. Writing is giving and receiving information that you can be compelled to share with others; whether it is emotional, intellectual, or spiritual. Writing is a world of its own.
Bacon's Rebellion - Portfolio
The Government is at Fault for Bacon's Rebellion, Not Nathanial Bacon
The time period in which Bacon's Rebellion occurred was a compelling moment in history. Some say Nathanial Bacon's actions were horrible, while others view him as a hero. Bacon's Rebellion was highly significant because it was an event that interfered with authority, defiance, confrontation, struggle, and evidently, no solution. Although the rebellion was officially started by a man named Nathanial Bacon, it is not necessarily his fault. The rebellion was a ripple effect. The downfall of a leader’s disappointment to colonists, led to the effective strength of one colonist taking a stand. Nathanial Bacon had great influence in Virginia. He impelled the lower class to make a difference. He challenged the government to be stronger. He most definitely affected the lifestyles of those in Virginia during that time period. While satisfying the people behind him, he caused a major ruckus for those who despised him. As all these interferences are expressed, they are voiced in such a way that shows the Government of Virginia is clearly at fault for Bacon's Rebellion, not Nathanial Bacon.
During the 17c, William Berkeley was appointed Governor of Virginia by the King of England. It would soon come to be that Governor Berkeley's control of the government would be a major contribution to Bacon's Rebellion. One factor for this is that Governor Berkeley met the needs and satisfactions of the upper class, leaving the lower class--mostly farmers-- out of the picture. When the colonists first arrived to the new Virginian lands, Berkeley allowed his colony to settle on native lands. During the transition into native lands, Berkeley also wanted to befriend the natives, without consulting ahead of time to see exactly what he was getting himself, and his colony into. The colony of Virginia knew nothing about the Natives and their lifestyles. Taking land from these people, then trying to become friends with them was not the smartest action Berkeley lead his colonists to. Maybe Berkeley was doing what he thought was best for his colony, but poor decision making came from the fact that Berkeley was new to the New World, just like all the colonists, allowing him to make naive adjustments, especially when making the new land the colonists' home.
As the colonist settled to the new lands, so did conflict. Problems from petty to serious matters between the natives and colonists commonly resulted in murder “...I am sure if the Indian were not cowards, they might have destroyed all the upper plantations and killed all the people upon them” (Doc #9). The horrible murders and events brought the colonist to their leader, Governor Berkeley. They went to him for help and guidance against the natives hoping for an answer; for a stop to the madness. Unfortunately, Berkeley did just the opposite for the needs of his people. Instead of stepping up as a leader, Berkeley merely embraced the Natives for trading matters "The colonial governor was making a good profit from trading with the Indians, and was not willing to disrupt that business by triggering open war (Virginiaplaces.org). Selfishly more concerned with the economy of Virginia, than the innocent lives of people is visibly what Berkeley was choosing. Governor Berkeley made poor decisions while serving the colony of Virginia“The Governor much their friend, that he would not suffer any body to hurt one of the Indians, and he would be very much concerned for the loss of his Overseer...” (Doc #9) His people were simply unprotected against the Indians. There were wars every day between the colonists and the Indians. While this occurred on a daily basis, Governor Berkeley was taking no action. This put the colonists in a position to continuously get hurt. “The unsatisfied People finding themselves still liable to the Indian cruelties…” (Doc #16). Complaint after complaint, he finally made little effort. To make an appearance of attempt, Governor Berkeley came up with a “solution”. Claiming to help end the acts of destruction, his response was to vaguely build forts for protection “What care the Assembly took to prevent these massacres was only to build forts at the heads of each river and on the frontiers and confines of the country…” (Doc#16). This did no good, for the Indians were not as inexperienced as Berkeley thought. In fact, the Indians were able to dominate the forts that were solemnly made to put them down. Putting forts up only at the heads of rivers and frontiers made the colonists look silly and foolish.
During this time period, there were basically two types of social rank. The upper class--usually made up of rich plantation owners, and the lower class that included indentured servants and necessitous farmers. Governor Berkeley favored the higher rank in the social class as they greatly admired him.Pleasing the colonists with money and wealth was flattering to Governor Berkeley. The people of the lower class were not being heard nor being reassured of their needs from the leadership of the colony. This made many lower class men furious, causing an up roar of rebellious men “Bacon’s Rebellion brought together groups from the lower classes. They were angry too—mostly about the huge gap between the rich and poor in Virginia” (Zinn, pg. 36). When Berkeley received a complaint from a lower class colonist, Nathanial Bacon, it would not be the last time Berkeley would have an encounter with him. Bacon was upset because natives had killed his friend and servant. When feeling no help from the Governor, Bacon became even more upset. Little did Berkeley know, sitting back and choosing to ignore the people's cry for help, would give Bacon the authority to pass Berkeley up for revenge and power “The frontiersmen felt that the colonial government had let them down…They were angry and they weren’t the only ones” (Zinn pg. 36) Nathanial Bacon had many men that that completely agreed with him, giving him strong support “In 1676, these unhappy Virginians found a leader in Nathanial Bacon” (Zinn pg. 37) Bacon took advantage of this and was able to become a leader in the House of Burgess's. Nathanial Bacon had passion in what he was pursuing. He cared deeply about his rights and fighting for what he believed in. Even though the leaders were against him, he kept pushing. Bacon literally got his motivation from the fact that people were against him. His desire came from having no response from the government, no response for a problem that needed to be solved immediately. “They elected Bacon to the colonial government, called the House of Burgess's…Bacon was ready to send armed militias or armed groups of citizens to fight the Indians”(Zinn pg.37) The mediocre men of Virginia were very complimentary to Bacon because they felt like someone took a chance to be a leader that was on their side. The great rebel's actions were altogether opposite of the Governor's. Governor Berkeley has no affection for the lower class as opposed to the upper class. The trifling governor intentionally pushed away the community of people that needed him the most. That is where Nathanial Bacon is most successful. The people looked up to him because he came and cleaned up after Governor Berkeley's messy tactics for taking care of the great Virginia colony.
Coming to the New World was opening the door to endless opportunity. Although the colony was not even a country or a nation yet, freedom was everywhere. Freedom was throughout laws and rules. Freedom was the colonist coming to the New World to start a fresh beginning. Bacon stood up for what he believed and broke through for rights; for freedom. He wanted to be noticed, to be heard and he very well accomplished that. By doing so, he set his stone in history. This is carried throughout each generation. A strong representation of this is going on today is strikes. Whether it’s for businesses, politics, laws, or just any given right, people have the opportunity to go on strike. The fact that people have the freedom to strike against something they don't agree with is gratifying. When communities of people go on strike, it is powerful. Their voices are heard and they have the ability to make change to a great extent. Going on strike is a form of rebellion against the rules and laws regulated. Just like Bacon’s Rebellion, Nathanial Bacon went against the rules. This event in history has been one link in the chain to why our wonderful country is known for its independence and freedom to this day.
It is truly sad that within communities, there are sides you have to chose to live by. The colony of Virginia was a crisp, new environment, yet people were already divided by rich and poor. Nathanial Bacon was shunned by most just because he was reaching out past the lower class. In most cases for history events, the heroes were rejected in their lives. When looking back on heroes, or simply people that are remembered for making a difference, is when all truth unfolds. The greatness of looking at Bacon's Rebellion from a bird's eye view, hundreds of years later, is very beneficial. Being able to see all of the Rebel's work gives a great aspect of how Nathanial Bacon made a change. Even though Nathanial Bacon was greatly looked down upon from the Government of Virginia and the upper class of his generation, Bacon made a difference. He fought for what needed to be done in his colony against the natives. Nathanial Bacon was definitely noticed and over all, and proved distinction in history.
Although Governor Berkeley does not get as much praise as Nathanial Bacon, he is a major reason for why Bacon's Rebellion is studied throughout history. Governor Berkeley gave Nathanial Bacon something to do; something to stand against. These men were both powerful because they challenged each other's weaknesses and strengths. The Government is at fault for Bacon's Rebellion because they chose to ignore red flags. If Governor Berkeley would have compassionately answered the request of his lower class, then Bacon would have not created the rebellion, with hundreds of men behind him. The outcome shows the strong rebel had to be defiant in order for lives to be protected in the lower class. The fate of this rebellion clearly represents the government of Virginia was sincerely ignorant.
The 44 documents handed out in class
[document # 9,16] "
A Young People's History of the United States" by Howard Zinn http://www.virginiaplaces.org/military/bacon.html
The time period in which Bacon's Rebellion occurred was a compelling moment in history. Some say Nathanial Bacon's actions were horrible, while others view him as a hero. Bacon's Rebellion was highly significant because it was an event that interfered with authority, defiance, confrontation, struggle, and evidently, no solution. Although the rebellion was officially started by a man named Nathanial Bacon, it is not necessarily his fault. The rebellion was a ripple effect. The downfall of a leader’s disappointment to colonists, led to the effective strength of one colonist taking a stand. Nathanial Bacon had great influence in Virginia. He impelled the lower class to make a difference. He challenged the government to be stronger. He most definitely affected the lifestyles of those in Virginia during that time period. While satisfying the people behind him, he caused a major ruckus for those who despised him. As all these interferences are expressed, they are voiced in such a way that shows the Government of Virginia is clearly at fault for Bacon's Rebellion, not Nathanial Bacon.
During the 17c, William Berkeley was appointed Governor of Virginia by the King of England. It would soon come to be that Governor Berkeley's control of the government would be a major contribution to Bacon's Rebellion. One factor for this is that Governor Berkeley met the needs and satisfactions of the upper class, leaving the lower class--mostly farmers-- out of the picture. When the colonists first arrived to the new Virginian lands, Berkeley allowed his colony to settle on native lands. During the transition into native lands, Berkeley also wanted to befriend the natives, without consulting ahead of time to see exactly what he was getting himself, and his colony into. The colony of Virginia knew nothing about the Natives and their lifestyles. Taking land from these people, then trying to become friends with them was not the smartest action Berkeley lead his colonists to. Maybe Berkeley was doing what he thought was best for his colony, but poor decision making came from the fact that Berkeley was new to the New World, just like all the colonists, allowing him to make naive adjustments, especially when making the new land the colonists' home.
As the colonist settled to the new lands, so did conflict. Problems from petty to serious matters between the natives and colonists commonly resulted in murder “...I am sure if the Indian were not cowards, they might have destroyed all the upper plantations and killed all the people upon them” (Doc #9). The horrible murders and events brought the colonist to their leader, Governor Berkeley. They went to him for help and guidance against the natives hoping for an answer; for a stop to the madness. Unfortunately, Berkeley did just the opposite for the needs of his people. Instead of stepping up as a leader, Berkeley merely embraced the Natives for trading matters "The colonial governor was making a good profit from trading with the Indians, and was not willing to disrupt that business by triggering open war (Virginiaplaces.org). Selfishly more concerned with the economy of Virginia, than the innocent lives of people is visibly what Berkeley was choosing. Governor Berkeley made poor decisions while serving the colony of Virginia“The Governor much their friend, that he would not suffer any body to hurt one of the Indians, and he would be very much concerned for the loss of his Overseer...” (Doc #9) His people were simply unprotected against the Indians. There were wars every day between the colonists and the Indians. While this occurred on a daily basis, Governor Berkeley was taking no action. This put the colonists in a position to continuously get hurt. “The unsatisfied People finding themselves still liable to the Indian cruelties…” (Doc #16). Complaint after complaint, he finally made little effort. To make an appearance of attempt, Governor Berkeley came up with a “solution”. Claiming to help end the acts of destruction, his response was to vaguely build forts for protection “What care the Assembly took to prevent these massacres was only to build forts at the heads of each river and on the frontiers and confines of the country…” (Doc#16). This did no good, for the Indians were not as inexperienced as Berkeley thought. In fact, the Indians were able to dominate the forts that were solemnly made to put them down. Putting forts up only at the heads of rivers and frontiers made the colonists look silly and foolish.
During this time period, there were basically two types of social rank. The upper class--usually made up of rich plantation owners, and the lower class that included indentured servants and necessitous farmers. Governor Berkeley favored the higher rank in the social class as they greatly admired him.Pleasing the colonists with money and wealth was flattering to Governor Berkeley. The people of the lower class were not being heard nor being reassured of their needs from the leadership of the colony. This made many lower class men furious, causing an up roar of rebellious men “Bacon’s Rebellion brought together groups from the lower classes. They were angry too—mostly about the huge gap between the rich and poor in Virginia” (Zinn, pg. 36). When Berkeley received a complaint from a lower class colonist, Nathanial Bacon, it would not be the last time Berkeley would have an encounter with him. Bacon was upset because natives had killed his friend and servant. When feeling no help from the Governor, Bacon became even more upset. Little did Berkeley know, sitting back and choosing to ignore the people's cry for help, would give Bacon the authority to pass Berkeley up for revenge and power “The frontiersmen felt that the colonial government had let them down…They were angry and they weren’t the only ones” (Zinn pg. 36) Nathanial Bacon had many men that that completely agreed with him, giving him strong support “In 1676, these unhappy Virginians found a leader in Nathanial Bacon” (Zinn pg. 37) Bacon took advantage of this and was able to become a leader in the House of Burgess's. Nathanial Bacon had passion in what he was pursuing. He cared deeply about his rights and fighting for what he believed in. Even though the leaders were against him, he kept pushing. Bacon literally got his motivation from the fact that people were against him. His desire came from having no response from the government, no response for a problem that needed to be solved immediately. “They elected Bacon to the colonial government, called the House of Burgess's…Bacon was ready to send armed militias or armed groups of citizens to fight the Indians”(Zinn pg.37) The mediocre men of Virginia were very complimentary to Bacon because they felt like someone took a chance to be a leader that was on their side. The great rebel's actions were altogether opposite of the Governor's. Governor Berkeley has no affection for the lower class as opposed to the upper class. The trifling governor intentionally pushed away the community of people that needed him the most. That is where Nathanial Bacon is most successful. The people looked up to him because he came and cleaned up after Governor Berkeley's messy tactics for taking care of the great Virginia colony.
Coming to the New World was opening the door to endless opportunity. Although the colony was not even a country or a nation yet, freedom was everywhere. Freedom was throughout laws and rules. Freedom was the colonist coming to the New World to start a fresh beginning. Bacon stood up for what he believed and broke through for rights; for freedom. He wanted to be noticed, to be heard and he very well accomplished that. By doing so, he set his stone in history. This is carried throughout each generation. A strong representation of this is going on today is strikes. Whether it’s for businesses, politics, laws, or just any given right, people have the opportunity to go on strike. The fact that people have the freedom to strike against something they don't agree with is gratifying. When communities of people go on strike, it is powerful. Their voices are heard and they have the ability to make change to a great extent. Going on strike is a form of rebellion against the rules and laws regulated. Just like Bacon’s Rebellion, Nathanial Bacon went against the rules. This event in history has been one link in the chain to why our wonderful country is known for its independence and freedom to this day.
It is truly sad that within communities, there are sides you have to chose to live by. The colony of Virginia was a crisp, new environment, yet people were already divided by rich and poor. Nathanial Bacon was shunned by most just because he was reaching out past the lower class. In most cases for history events, the heroes were rejected in their lives. When looking back on heroes, or simply people that are remembered for making a difference, is when all truth unfolds. The greatness of looking at Bacon's Rebellion from a bird's eye view, hundreds of years later, is very beneficial. Being able to see all of the Rebel's work gives a great aspect of how Nathanial Bacon made a change. Even though Nathanial Bacon was greatly looked down upon from the Government of Virginia and the upper class of his generation, Bacon made a difference. He fought for what needed to be done in his colony against the natives. Nathanial Bacon was definitely noticed and over all, and proved distinction in history.
Although Governor Berkeley does not get as much praise as Nathanial Bacon, he is a major reason for why Bacon's Rebellion is studied throughout history. Governor Berkeley gave Nathanial Bacon something to do; something to stand against. These men were both powerful because they challenged each other's weaknesses and strengths. The Government is at fault for Bacon's Rebellion because they chose to ignore red flags. If Governor Berkeley would have compassionately answered the request of his lower class, then Bacon would have not created the rebellion, with hundreds of men behind him. The outcome shows the strong rebel had to be defiant in order for lives to be protected in the lower class. The fate of this rebellion clearly represents the government of Virginia was sincerely ignorant.
The 44 documents handed out in class
[document # 9,16] "
A Young People's History of the United States" by Howard Zinn http://www.virginiaplaces.org/military/bacon.html
Portfolio: Final Exam Frame #2
Writing is a fundamental part of life when it is used and challenged in diverse ways. That is where you will find yourself becoming a better and stronger writer. Optimism One states that working together with other people is healthy. When writing and functioning together with people, it helps you to improve your writing skills. He backs up his opinion with a great quote from Peter Elbow that basically says finding people to read and critique your work is beneficial when working with an open mind mentality. Naturally, working with other minds creates inspirational pieces of art. I feel you can relate this to many aspects of life. For example, businesses and companies come together all the time to discuss situations and problems. To try to work out and negotiate complications, to come to a conclusion, and to improve and please everyone’s needs.
This brings me to how Optimism One’s views apply to my personal experience with writing this quarter. During writing 101, we posted all of our work to a blog website. When coming together during class, we were assigned to read other student’s blogs and do peer review. I felt like this was very helpful and I also was eager to peer review my classmates’ work to help point out to them their weaknesses and strengths. A result of writing 101 brought an atmosphere of trust among all of us as students. I say this because I took their criticism to my work seriously. I felt like I was able to write and no one was going to look down on me. Instead they would bring me up by helping me with trying to improve what I was writing. I hope that I benefited them as well and over all, we challenged each other to become better writers.
Another great example of this in Writing 101 was when we did essay #3. Essay #3 was a class debate and everyone was divided into groups of three to four in each group. Out of all the assignments I did this quarter, I felt like essay #3 was the most enjoyable. When working together, it brought so much more creativity and quality to the table than if I were to just work by myself. We all brainstormed together and came up with many ideas that benefited our group. It also helped me to become more open minded when working. I realize that everyone is intelligent in their own unique ways and when we come together to work, the diversity is a positive attribute, especially because everyone in my group was willing to work together.
It takes a great amount of maturity to be able to work together while maintaining a positive environment. I have personally accomplished this and it is one reason I take pleasure in being accountable to working together. I agree with everything that Optimism One states in his passage so there is no room for disagreement. Although there are many people that are very strongly opinionated, it is always possible to work together and have democratic privileges. If everyone was willing to get along and work together, in particular to using writing talents, than this world would definitely be a better place.
This brings me to how Optimism One’s views apply to my personal experience with writing this quarter. During writing 101, we posted all of our work to a blog website. When coming together during class, we were assigned to read other student’s blogs and do peer review. I felt like this was very helpful and I also was eager to peer review my classmates’ work to help point out to them their weaknesses and strengths. A result of writing 101 brought an atmosphere of trust among all of us as students. I say this because I took their criticism to my work seriously. I felt like I was able to write and no one was going to look down on me. Instead they would bring me up by helping me with trying to improve what I was writing. I hope that I benefited them as well and over all, we challenged each other to become better writers.
Another great example of this in Writing 101 was when we did essay #3. Essay #3 was a class debate and everyone was divided into groups of three to four in each group. Out of all the assignments I did this quarter, I felt like essay #3 was the most enjoyable. When working together, it brought so much more creativity and quality to the table than if I were to just work by myself. We all brainstormed together and came up with many ideas that benefited our group. It also helped me to become more open minded when working. I realize that everyone is intelligent in their own unique ways and when we come together to work, the diversity is a positive attribute, especially because everyone in my group was willing to work together.
It takes a great amount of maturity to be able to work together while maintaining a positive environment. I have personally accomplished this and it is one reason I take pleasure in being accountable to working together. I agree with everything that Optimism One states in his passage so there is no room for disagreement. Although there are many people that are very strongly opinionated, it is always possible to work together and have democratic privileges. If everyone was willing to get along and work together, in particular to using writing talents, than this world would definitely be a better place.
Monday, December 1, 2008
Text Analysis: Kentucky Resolution 1799
Kentucky Resolution - Alien and Sedition Acts
RESOLUTIONS IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY
--Who is writing?
The writers are the good people of the common wealth
"THE representatives of the good people of this commonwealth in general assembly convened, having maturely considered the answers of sundry states in the Union,"
--Who is the audience?
The audience includes American states and the Union.
"RESOLVED, That this commonwealth considers the federal union, upon the terms and for the purposes specified in the late compact, as conducive to the liberty and happiness of the several states"
--Who do the writers represent?
The writers represent the commonwealth people of America.
"THE representatives of the good people of this commonwealth in general assembly convened, having maturely considered the answers of sundry states in the Union, to their resolutions passed at the last session, respecting certain unconstitutional laws of Congress,"
--What is being said, argued and/or requested?
The people of the commonwealth feel the Union's alien and sedition laws interfere with the constitution for the people.
"commonly called the alien and sedition laws, would be faithless indeed to themselves, and to those they represent, were they silently to acquiesce in principles and doctrines attempted to be maintained in all those answers, that of Virginia only excepted. To again enter the field of argument, and attempt more fully or forcibly to expose the unconstitutionality of those obnoxious laws, would, it is apprehended be as unnecessary as unavailing. "
--How is it being said, argued and/or requested?
The commonwealth disagree with the Union's decisions and actions with the laws formed. They approach the situation with disagreement and strong discern. Instead of using violence or negative action, they are requesting a solution in a respectful and assertive manner.
"AND FINALLY, in order that no pretexts or arguments may be drawn from a supposed acquiescence on the part of this commonwealth in the constitutionality of those laws, and be thereby used as precedents for similar future violations of federal compact; this commonwealth does now enter against them, its SOLEMN PROTEST"
--What proof and/or justification is being used to legitimize the request?
"That although this commonwealth as a party to the federal compact; will bow to the laws of the union, yet at the same time declare, that it will not now, nor ever hereafter, cease to oppose in a constitutional manner, every attempt from what quarter soever offered, to violate that compact:"
They warn that they are going to protest for what they want against the union.
RESOLUTIONS IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY
--Who is writing?
The writers are the good people of the common wealth
"THE representatives of the good people of this commonwealth in general assembly convened, having maturely considered the answers of sundry states in the Union,"
--Who is the audience?
The audience includes American states and the Union.
"RESOLVED, That this commonwealth considers the federal union, upon the terms and for the purposes specified in the late compact, as conducive to the liberty and happiness of the several states"
--Who do the writers represent?
The writers represent the commonwealth people of America.
"THE representatives of the good people of this commonwealth in general assembly convened, having maturely considered the answers of sundry states in the Union, to their resolutions passed at the last session, respecting certain unconstitutional laws of Congress,"
--What is being said, argued and/or requested?
The people of the commonwealth feel the Union's alien and sedition laws interfere with the constitution for the people.
"commonly called the alien and sedition laws, would be faithless indeed to themselves, and to those they represent, were they silently to acquiesce in principles and doctrines attempted to be maintained in all those answers, that of Virginia only excepted. To again enter the field of argument, and attempt more fully or forcibly to expose the unconstitutionality of those obnoxious laws, would, it is apprehended be as unnecessary as unavailing. "
--How is it being said, argued and/or requested?
The commonwealth disagree with the Union's decisions and actions with the laws formed. They approach the situation with disagreement and strong discern. Instead of using violence or negative action, they are requesting a solution in a respectful and assertive manner.
"AND FINALLY, in order that no pretexts or arguments may be drawn from a supposed acquiescence on the part of this commonwealth in the constitutionality of those laws, and be thereby used as precedents for similar future violations of federal compact; this commonwealth does now enter against them, its SOLEMN PROTEST"
--What proof and/or justification is being used to legitimize the request?
"That although this commonwealth as a party to the federal compact; will bow to the laws of the union, yet at the same time declare, that it will not now, nor ever hereafter, cease to oppose in a constitutional manner, every attempt from what quarter soever offered, to violate that compact:"
They warn that they are going to protest for what they want against the union.
Friday, November 21, 2008
ESSAY #2 Final Draft
Patriotism in Virginia
We, the people of Virginia, are most definitely becoming a flourishing colony. We are a leading colony here in America, and with our accelerated growth of culture, wealth, and population, we continue to strive for the best in Virginia. One breakdown within Virginia is the conflicts with the House of Burgess'. This is a result from the strong differences between the loyalists and patriots. Could this lead to a major battle…or possibly war? To all neighboring colonies; we wish the best for all the patriots out there. We wish the best for freedom and rights.
To be a patriot is to be a person who regards himself or herself as a defender, especially of individual rights, against presumed interference by the federal government. Britain has created an atmosphere of instability here in the New World. That is why I have come to the conclusion that being connected with our mother country prevents Virginia from becoming independent, and socially and economically abundant. The wars against Britain have become a requirement for our basic human rights in Virginia. Although Britain is half way across the world, they are smothering us. This has ordered Virginia militia to create an army. "Resolved, that a well regulated militia composed of gentlemen and yeomen is the natural strength and only security of a free government; that such a militia in this colony (Virginia) would forever render it unnecessary for the mother country to keep among us, for the purpose of our defense, any standing army of mercenary forces, always subversive of the quiet, and dangerous to the liberties of the people, and would obviate the pretext of taxing us for their support." (http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/res_cong_va_1775.asp) This is from the Resolutions of the Provincial Congress of Virginia, and it was written and created for Virginia’s protection. A downfall to Virginia at this point is the fact that the British are intertwined with us in our communities. This is commonly why the House of Burgess’ is struggling at this point. The Englishmen and loyalist have hatred for us as patriots, which creates major diversity and separation. Us patriots do not want to have hatred, we simply want what is best for our colony; freedom.
We are constantly being manipulated and badgered by our mother country. I strive for freedom and justice in Virginia, and in America. Britain tries so hard to control our every move. They can only do so much due to the fact they live so far away. The British are getting under our skin and simply trying to break our spirits. There is countless proof for the negativity reigning throughout our colony by Great Britain. "...for quartering large bodies of troops among us; for cutting off our trade with all parts of the world; for imposing taxes on us without our consent; for depriving us of the benefits of trial by jury..."(http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/jeffcons.asp) This was specifically spoken at the Virginia Convention. We befriend our neighboring colonies, but that will not stop us from keeping Virginia protected as a top priority, even if that means we have to mention all the wrong doings Britain has done to us.
At this point the glass is half empty rather than half full; or anywhere near optimism. The unjust actions created against us outweigh anything that has ever nurtured our relationship with Great Britain. Unfortunately, Virginia has come to the point of setting rules against communication with Britain. "Resolved, that if any person or persons shall export tobacco, or any other commodity, to Great Britain, after the 10th day of August, 1775, contrary to this association, we shall hold ourselves obliged to consider such person or persons as inimical to the community, and as an approved of American grievances; and give it as our opinion that the public should be advertised of his conduct, as in the 8th article is desired " (http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/assoc_of_va_conv_1774.asp)
There are many Loyalist and undecided men out here that are for British rule because they feel Britain is inevitable and will win under any circumstance. Well, we believe different and we were not raised to live in this country as weak, scared men. A great Patriotic leader from Virginia, Nathan Hale, cannot express it any better when he fought till the end declaring "I am so satisfied with the cause in which I have engaged, that my only regret is, that I have not more lives than one to offer in its service" (A Possible Source for Nathan Hale's Dying Words 394). He is a great role model of mine and took his role of leadership, influencing Virginia’s freedom. We are here to pursue all the opportunities that await us. Britain is choosing to selfishly stand in the way and I will not let life pass me by. Patriots are known to take action and fight through until victory. Virginia was founded for freedom and rights. Men have great love for their country and I have lost not only my love, but my great respect for Britain. We have been let down and manipulated repeatedly. We will not tolerate it any longer, and it is strongly declared in the Declaration of Independence as quoted, "The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states" (http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/declare.asp). We the patriots of Virginia, carry pride and strength. We will fight until the end for our dignity and freedom from Great Britain.
Donnelly, F.K.. "A Possible Source for Nathan Hale's Dying Words." The William and Mary Quarterly 42(1985): 394-396.
Avalon Documents
Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776
The Association of the Virginia Convention; August 1-6, 1774
Draft constitution for Virginia 1776
Resolutions of the Provincial Congress of Virginia; March 23, 1775
We, the people of Virginia, are most definitely becoming a flourishing colony. We are a leading colony here in America, and with our accelerated growth of culture, wealth, and population, we continue to strive for the best in Virginia. One breakdown within Virginia is the conflicts with the House of Burgess'. This is a result from the strong differences between the loyalists and patriots. Could this lead to a major battle…or possibly war? To all neighboring colonies; we wish the best for all the patriots out there. We wish the best for freedom and rights.
To be a patriot is to be a person who regards himself or herself as a defender, especially of individual rights, against presumed interference by the federal government. Britain has created an atmosphere of instability here in the New World. That is why I have come to the conclusion that being connected with our mother country prevents Virginia from becoming independent, and socially and economically abundant. The wars against Britain have become a requirement for our basic human rights in Virginia. Although Britain is half way across the world, they are smothering us. This has ordered Virginia militia to create an army. "Resolved, that a well regulated militia composed of gentlemen and yeomen is the natural strength and only security of a free government; that such a militia in this colony (Virginia) would forever render it unnecessary for the mother country to keep among us, for the purpose of our defense, any standing army of mercenary forces, always subversive of the quiet, and dangerous to the liberties of the people, and would obviate the pretext of taxing us for their support." (http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/res_cong_va_1775.asp) This is from the Resolutions of the Provincial Congress of Virginia, and it was written and created for Virginia’s protection. A downfall to Virginia at this point is the fact that the British are intertwined with us in our communities. This is commonly why the House of Burgess’ is struggling at this point. The Englishmen and loyalist have hatred for us as patriots, which creates major diversity and separation. Us patriots do not want to have hatred, we simply want what is best for our colony; freedom.
We are constantly being manipulated and badgered by our mother country. I strive for freedom and justice in Virginia, and in America. Britain tries so hard to control our every move. They can only do so much due to the fact they live so far away. The British are getting under our skin and simply trying to break our spirits. There is countless proof for the negativity reigning throughout our colony by Great Britain. "...for quartering large bodies of troops among us; for cutting off our trade with all parts of the world; for imposing taxes on us without our consent; for depriving us of the benefits of trial by jury..."(http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/jeffcons.asp) This was specifically spoken at the Virginia Convention. We befriend our neighboring colonies, but that will not stop us from keeping Virginia protected as a top priority, even if that means we have to mention all the wrong doings Britain has done to us.
At this point the glass is half empty rather than half full; or anywhere near optimism. The unjust actions created against us outweigh anything that has ever nurtured our relationship with Great Britain. Unfortunately, Virginia has come to the point of setting rules against communication with Britain. "Resolved, that if any person or persons shall export tobacco, or any other commodity, to Great Britain, after the 10th day of August, 1775, contrary to this association, we shall hold ourselves obliged to consider such person or persons as inimical to the community, and as an approved of American grievances; and give it as our opinion that the public should be advertised of his conduct, as in the 8th article is desired " (http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/assoc_of_va_conv_1774.asp)
There are many Loyalist and undecided men out here that are for British rule because they feel Britain is inevitable and will win under any circumstance. Well, we believe different and we were not raised to live in this country as weak, scared men. A great Patriotic leader from Virginia, Nathan Hale, cannot express it any better when he fought till the end declaring "I am so satisfied with the cause in which I have engaged, that my only regret is, that I have not more lives than one to offer in its service" (A Possible Source for Nathan Hale's Dying Words 394). He is a great role model of mine and took his role of leadership, influencing Virginia’s freedom. We are here to pursue all the opportunities that await us. Britain is choosing to selfishly stand in the way and I will not let life pass me by. Patriots are known to take action and fight through until victory. Virginia was founded for freedom and rights. Men have great love for their country and I have lost not only my love, but my great respect for Britain. We have been let down and manipulated repeatedly. We will not tolerate it any longer, and it is strongly declared in the Declaration of Independence as quoted, "The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states" (http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/declare.asp). We the patriots of Virginia, carry pride and strength. We will fight until the end for our dignity and freedom from Great Britain.
Donnelly, F.K.. "A Possible Source for Nathan Hale's Dying Words." The William and Mary Quarterly 42(1985): 394-396.
Avalon Documents
Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776
The Association of the Virginia Convention; August 1-6, 1774
Draft constitution for Virginia 1776
Resolutions of the Provincial Congress of Virginia; March 23, 1775
Monday, November 17, 2008
Essay #2 Rough Draft
We, the people of Virginia, are most definitely a flourishing colony. With our accelerated growth of culture, wealth and population, we continue to strive for the best in Virginia. Conflict with the House of Burgess' of Virginia is becauase of the strong differences between the loyalists and patriots.
To be a patriot is to be a person who regards himself or herself as a defender, especially of individual rights, against presumed interference by the federal government. Britain has created an atmosphere of instability here in the New World. That is why I have come to the conclusion that being connected with our mother country prevents Virginia from becoming independent and socially and economically abundant. The wars against Britain have become a requirement for our basic human rights in Virginia. Although Britain is half way across the world, they are smothering us. This has ordered us to create an army. "Resolved, that a well regulated militia composed of gentlemen and yeomen is the natural strength and only security of a free government; that such a militia in this colony (Virginia) would forever render it unnecessary for the mother country to keep among us, for the purpose of our defence, any standing army of mercenary forces, always subversive of the quiet, and dangerous to the liberties of the people, and would obviate the pretext of taxing us for their support." (http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/res_cong_va_1775.asp) The downfall to Virginia at this point is the fact that we live with the British here in our communities. The Englishmen and loyalist have hatred for us as patriots which creates major diversity. Us patriots dont want to have hatred, we simply want whats best for our colony; freedom.
We are constantly being manipulated and badgered by our mother country. Being a patriot, I strive for freedom and justice in Virginia, and in America. Britain tries so hard to control our every move. They can only do so much due to the fact they live so far away... The British are getting under our skin and simply trying to break our spirits. There is countless proof for the negativity reigning throughout our colony by Great Britain. "...for quartering large bodies of troops among us; for cutting off our trade with all parts of the world; for imposing taxes on us without our consent; for depriving us of the benefits of trial by jury..."(http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/jeffcons.asp)
At this point the glass is half empty rather than half full; or anywhere near optimism. The unjust actions created against us outweigh anything that has ever nurtured our relationship with Great Britain. Unfortunately, we have come to the point of setting rules against communication with Britain. "Resolved, that if any person or persons shall export tobacco, or any other commodity, to Great Britain, after the 10th day of August, 1775, contrary to this association, we shall hold ourselves obliged to consider such person or persons as inimical to the community, and as an approved of American grievances; and give it as our opinion that the public should be advertised of his conduct, as in the 8th article is desired " (http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/assoc_of_va_conv_1774.asp)
There are many Loyalist and undecided men out here that are for British rule because they feel Britain is inevitable and will win under any circumstance. Well, we believe different and we were not raised to live in this country as weak, scared men. A great Patriotic leader, Nathan Hale, cannot put it any better when he fought till the end declaring "I am so satisfied with the cause in which I have engaged, that my only regret is, that I have not more lives than one to offer in its service" (use quote link on citation machine) We are here to pursue all the opportunities that await us. Britain is choosing to selfishly stand in the way and I will not let life pass me by. Virginia was created for freedom and for rights. Men have great love for their country, but I have lost not only my love but my great respect for Britain. We have been let down and manipulated repeatedly. We will not tolerate it any longer, and it is strongly declared in the Declaration of Independence as quoted, "The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states" (http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/declare.asp)
We the patriots of Virginia, carry pride and strength. We will fight until the end for our dignity and freedom from Great Britain.
points to add
- how Britain only has their best interest in mind instead of the colonies
-blend my quotes with my commentary smoothly
quote used for NATHAN HALE info (use citation machine)
http://moe.ic.highline.edu:2117/stable/1918934?&Search=yes&term=Nathan&term=Hale&list=hide&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoAdvancedSearch%3Fq0%3DNathan%2BHale%26f0%3Dall%26c0%3DAND%26q1%3D%26f1%3Dall%26c1%3DAND%26q2%3D%26f2%3Dall%26c2%3DAND%26q3%3D%26f3%3Dall%26wc%3Don%26Search%3DSearch%26ar%3Don%26sd%3D%26ed%3D%26la%3D%26jo%3D%26dc.History%3DHistory&item=1&ttl=163&returnArticleService=showArticle)
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/ratva.asp
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/18th.asp
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/18th.asp
To be a patriot is to be a person who regards himself or herself as a defender, especially of individual rights, against presumed interference by the federal government. Britain has created an atmosphere of instability here in the New World. That is why I have come to the conclusion that being connected with our mother country prevents Virginia from becoming independent and socially and economically abundant. The wars against Britain have become a requirement for our basic human rights in Virginia. Although Britain is half way across the world, they are smothering us. This has ordered us to create an army. "Resolved, that a well regulated militia composed of gentlemen and yeomen is the natural strength and only security of a free government; that such a militia in this colony (Virginia) would forever render it unnecessary for the mother country to keep among us, for the purpose of our defence, any standing army of mercenary forces, always subversive of the quiet, and dangerous to the liberties of the people, and would obviate the pretext of taxing us for their support." (http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/res_cong_va_1775.asp) The downfall to Virginia at this point is the fact that we live with the British here in our communities. The Englishmen and loyalist have hatred for us as patriots which creates major diversity. Us patriots dont want to have hatred, we simply want whats best for our colony; freedom.
We are constantly being manipulated and badgered by our mother country. Being a patriot, I strive for freedom and justice in Virginia, and in America. Britain tries so hard to control our every move. They can only do so much due to the fact they live so far away... The British are getting under our skin and simply trying to break our spirits. There is countless proof for the negativity reigning throughout our colony by Great Britain. "...for quartering large bodies of troops among us; for cutting off our trade with all parts of the world; for imposing taxes on us without our consent; for depriving us of the benefits of trial by jury..."(http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/jeffcons.asp)
At this point the glass is half empty rather than half full; or anywhere near optimism. The unjust actions created against us outweigh anything that has ever nurtured our relationship with Great Britain. Unfortunately, we have come to the point of setting rules against communication with Britain. "Resolved, that if any person or persons shall export tobacco, or any other commodity, to Great Britain, after the 10th day of August, 1775, contrary to this association, we shall hold ourselves obliged to consider such person or persons as inimical to the community, and as an approved of American grievances; and give it as our opinion that the public should be advertised of his conduct, as in the 8th article is desired " (http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/assoc_of_va_conv_1774.asp)
There are many Loyalist and undecided men out here that are for British rule because they feel Britain is inevitable and will win under any circumstance. Well, we believe different and we were not raised to live in this country as weak, scared men. A great Patriotic leader, Nathan Hale, cannot put it any better when he fought till the end declaring "I am so satisfied with the cause in which I have engaged, that my only regret is, that I have not more lives than one to offer in its service" (use quote link on citation machine) We are here to pursue all the opportunities that await us. Britain is choosing to selfishly stand in the way and I will not let life pass me by. Virginia was created for freedom and for rights. Men have great love for their country, but I have lost not only my love but my great respect for Britain. We have been let down and manipulated repeatedly. We will not tolerate it any longer, and it is strongly declared in the Declaration of Independence as quoted, "The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states" (http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/declare.asp)
We the patriots of Virginia, carry pride and strength. We will fight until the end for our dignity and freedom from Great Britain.
points to add
- how Britain only has their best interest in mind instead of the colonies
-blend my quotes with my commentary smoothly
quote used for NATHAN HALE info (use citation machine)
http://moe.ic.highline.edu:2117/stable/1918934?&Search=yes&term=Nathan&term=Hale&list=hide&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoAdvancedSearch%3Fq0%3DNathan%2BHale%26f0%3Dall%26c0%3DAND%26q1%3D%26f1%3Dall%26c1%3DAND%26q2%3D%26f2%3Dall%26c2%3DAND%26q3%3D%26f3%3Dall%26wc%3Don%26Search%3DSearch%26ar%3Don%26sd%3D%26ed%3D%26la%3D%26jo%3D%26dc.History%3DHistory&item=1&ttl=163&returnArticleService=showArticle)
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/ratva.asp
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/18th.asp
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/18th.asp
Friday, November 14, 2008
essay #2 outline Patriot for Virginia
Essay #2 outline
VIRGINIA PATRIOT
I. Being connected with the mother country creates conflict for Virginia to become independent and abundant.
--A. The wars against Britain have become a requirement for human rights in Virginia. Although Britain is half way across the world, they are smothering us. Being a patriot, I strive for freedom and justice in America.
---1. "Resolved, that a well regulated militia composed of gentlemen and yeomen is the natural strength and only security of a free government; that such a militia in this colony (Virginia) would forever render it unnecessary for the mother country to keep among us, for the purpose of our defence, any standing army of mercenary forces, always subversive of the quiet, and dangerous to the liberties of the people, and would obviate the pretext of taxing us for their support." (http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/res_cong_va_1775.asp)
--II. Britain tries so hard to control our every move. They can only do so much due to the fact they live so far away...
----A. The British are getting under our skin and simply trying to destroy us. There is countless proof for the negativity reigning throughout our colony by Great Britain.
-----1. "...for quartering large bodies of troops among us; for cutting off our trade with all parts of the world; for imposing taxes on us without our consent; for depriving us of the benefits of trial by jury..."(http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/jeffcons.asp)
----a. At this point the glass is half empty rather than half full; or anywhere near optimism. The unjust actions created against us outweigh anything that has ever nurtured our relationship with Great Britain.
III. Unfortunately, we have come to the point of setting rules against communication with Britain.
--A. "Resolved, that if any person or persons shall export tobacco, or any other commodity, to Great Britain, after the 10th day of August, 1775, contrary to this association, we shall hold ourselves obliged to consider such person or persons as inimical to the community, and as an approved of American grievances; and give it as our opinion that the public should be advertised of his conduct, as in the 8th article is desired " (http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/assoc_of_va_conv_1774.asp)
---1.In order to maintain peace we need to stick up for ourselves.
-----a.By sticking up for ourselves, we are able to show the magnitude of our strength. As strong patriots, we show Britain that we dont need them if this is the way they chose to treat us.
-----b.We the patriots of Virginia, carry pride and strength. We will fight until the end for our dignity and freedom from Great Britain.
extra info to use
which the remonstrants take leave to think would be inconsistent with the fundamental principles of the constitution, the exercise of that power at this time would be ruinous to Virginia, who exerted herself in the late war, it is feared, beyond her strength, insomuch that to redeem the money granted for that exigence her people are taxed for (http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/petition_va_1764.asp)
In this state of extreme danger, we have no alternative left but an abject submission to the will of those overbearing tyrants, or a total separation from the Crown and Government of Great Britain, uniting and exerting the strength of all America for defence, and forming alliances with foreign Powers for commerce and aid in war:-(http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/const02.asp)
I That all men are by nature equally free and independent, and have certain inherent rights, of which, when they enter into a state of society, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity; namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety. (http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/virginia.asp)
--------commentary they were not able to pursue this under British control. How can we take action for the declaration if we are busy fighting with Britain?
VIRGINIA PATRIOT
I. Being connected with the mother country creates conflict for Virginia to become independent and abundant.
--A. The wars against Britain have become a requirement for human rights in Virginia. Although Britain is half way across the world, they are smothering us. Being a patriot, I strive for freedom and justice in America.
---1. "Resolved, that a well regulated militia composed of gentlemen and yeomen is the natural strength and only security of a free government; that such a militia in this colony (Virginia) would forever render it unnecessary for the mother country to keep among us, for the purpose of our defence, any standing army of mercenary forces, always subversive of the quiet, and dangerous to the liberties of the people, and would obviate the pretext of taxing us for their support." (http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/res_cong_va_1775.asp)
--II. Britain tries so hard to control our every move. They can only do so much due to the fact they live so far away...
----A. The British are getting under our skin and simply trying to destroy us. There is countless proof for the negativity reigning throughout our colony by Great Britain.
-----1. "...for quartering large bodies of troops among us; for cutting off our trade with all parts of the world; for imposing taxes on us without our consent; for depriving us of the benefits of trial by jury..."(http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/jeffcons.asp)
----a. At this point the glass is half empty rather than half full; or anywhere near optimism. The unjust actions created against us outweigh anything that has ever nurtured our relationship with Great Britain.
III. Unfortunately, we have come to the point of setting rules against communication with Britain.
--A. "Resolved, that if any person or persons shall export tobacco, or any other commodity, to Great Britain, after the 10th day of August, 1775, contrary to this association, we shall hold ourselves obliged to consider such person or persons as inimical to the community, and as an approved of American grievances; and give it as our opinion that the public should be advertised of his conduct, as in the 8th article is desired " (http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/assoc_of_va_conv_1774.asp)
---1.In order to maintain peace we need to stick up for ourselves.
-----a.By sticking up for ourselves, we are able to show the magnitude of our strength. As strong patriots, we show Britain that we dont need them if this is the way they chose to treat us.
-----b.We the patriots of Virginia, carry pride and strength. We will fight until the end for our dignity and freedom from Great Britain.
extra info to use
which the remonstrants take leave to think would be inconsistent with the fundamental principles of the constitution, the exercise of that power at this time would be ruinous to Virginia, who exerted herself in the late war, it is feared, beyond her strength, insomuch that to redeem the money granted for that exigence her people are taxed for (http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/petition_va_1764.asp)
In this state of extreme danger, we have no alternative left but an abject submission to the will of those overbearing tyrants, or a total separation from the Crown and Government of Great Britain, uniting and exerting the strength of all America for defence, and forming alliances with foreign Powers for commerce and aid in war:-(http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/const02.asp)
I That all men are by nature equally free and independent, and have certain inherent rights, of which, when they enter into a state of society, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity; namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety. (http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/virginia.asp)
--------commentary they were not able to pursue this under British control. How can we take action for the declaration if we are busy fighting with Britain?
Tuesday, November 4, 2008
text analysis #2
--Who is writing?
The writers are the colonists of all colonies
“We, your Majesty's faithful subjects of the colonies new Hampshire, Massachusetts bay, Rhode island and Providence Plantations, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, the counties of New Castle, Kent, and Sussex, on Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, and South Carolina, in behalf of ourselves, and the inhabitants of these colonies, who have deputed us to represent them in general Congress, entreat your Majesty's gracious attention to this our humble petition.”
--Who is the audience?
The Audience is the King’s most excellent majesty
“To the King's most excellent Majesty:
--Who do the writers represent?
The writers represent the colonists in America.
--What is being said, argued and/or requested?
The colonists are telling the King that they have gone against their wills. Their common wills that have to fight against the King and his soldiers. The colonists feel like they have to protect themselves from Britain. This is ridiculous because Britain is their ancestry and founding country.
“Your Majesty's Ministers, persevering in their measures, and proceeding to open hostilities for enforcing them, have compelled us to arm in our own defense,”
--How is it being said, argued and/or requested?
They show the king much respect. They address him with humbleness and dignity
“We beg leave further to assure your Majesty, that notwithstanding the sufferings of your loyal colonists, during the course of the present controversy, our breasts retain too tender a regard for the kingdom from which we derive our origin, to request such a reconciliation as might in any manner be inconsistent with her dignity or her welfare.”
--What proof and/or justification is being used to legitimize the request?
They address the king in letter formation. It is a large letter that is polite yet strong in what they are asking from the king.
The writers are the colonists of all colonies
“We, your Majesty's faithful subjects of the colonies new Hampshire, Massachusetts bay, Rhode island and Providence Plantations, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, the counties of New Castle, Kent, and Sussex, on Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, and South Carolina, in behalf of ourselves, and the inhabitants of these colonies, who have deputed us to represent them in general Congress, entreat your Majesty's gracious attention to this our humble petition.”
--Who is the audience?
The Audience is the King’s most excellent majesty
“To the King's most excellent Majesty:
--Who do the writers represent?
The writers represent the colonists in America.
--What is being said, argued and/or requested?
The colonists are telling the King that they have gone against their wills. Their common wills that have to fight against the King and his soldiers. The colonists feel like they have to protect themselves from Britain. This is ridiculous because Britain is their ancestry and founding country.
“Your Majesty's Ministers, persevering in their measures, and proceeding to open hostilities for enforcing them, have compelled us to arm in our own defense,”
--How is it being said, argued and/or requested?
They show the king much respect. They address him with humbleness and dignity
“We beg leave further to assure your Majesty, that notwithstanding the sufferings of your loyal colonists, during the course of the present controversy, our breasts retain too tender a regard for the kingdom from which we derive our origin, to request such a reconciliation as might in any manner be inconsistent with her dignity or her welfare.”
--What proof and/or justification is being used to legitimize the request?
They address the king in letter formation. It is a large letter that is polite yet strong in what they are asking from the king.
Thursday, October 30, 2008
Sythesizing
main idea/historical concepts
use document responses/quote from class/video clip
Although America was known as the land of opportunities, Great Britain nagged and picked on colonists in America in every which way they could. What was behind this harsh judgement? Jealousy? Ego? Britain treated the colonies horribly and unjust. The colonies in America were a branch off of Great Britain, automatically giving them less authority--no authority at this point in time. The major issue that tore colonists from Britain was the taxes; the Stampt Act.
"The power to tax is the power to destroy". That is so profound and true in this matter. Little flames of unjust acts towards the colonists would soon light the fire to major destruction. England taxed literally everything in America. This affected absolutely everyone and brought anger and rage to the colonists.Because Britain was so far behind in it's economy due to wars, they put a heavy burden on America to help pay taxes. Logically, it makes sense that America--being so intertwined with Britain--would help pay taxes as well. But taxing all the way to playing cards and lawyer documents was just wrong. The differences between Great Britain and the new America were so vast. America was all about exploring and finding new things. They were always improving and changing things for their lifestyles. This is quite contrast to the old Great Britain that lived off of rituals and patterns of the same thing. This is probably the main reason Britain looked down on America. America was changing rapidly and Britain did not approve. John Adam's quote on "Revolution of the Mind" is something I find so true. The harsh communication among the men of Britain and America, the nonsense of all the taxing, the mistreating, every little thing led up and built up to war. Each negative problem between America and Great Britain was a flame that brought up the fire and explosion.
use document responses/quote from class/video clip
Although America was known as the land of opportunities, Great Britain nagged and picked on colonists in America in every which way they could. What was behind this harsh judgement? Jealousy? Ego? Britain treated the colonies horribly and unjust. The colonies in America were a branch off of Great Britain, automatically giving them less authority--no authority at this point in time. The major issue that tore colonists from Britain was the taxes; the Stampt Act.
"The power to tax is the power to destroy". That is so profound and true in this matter. Little flames of unjust acts towards the colonists would soon light the fire to major destruction. England taxed literally everything in America. This affected absolutely everyone and brought anger and rage to the colonists.Because Britain was so far behind in it's economy due to wars, they put a heavy burden on America to help pay taxes. Logically, it makes sense that America--being so intertwined with Britain--would help pay taxes as well. But taxing all the way to playing cards and lawyer documents was just wrong. The differences between Great Britain and the new America were so vast. America was all about exploring and finding new things. They were always improving and changing things for their lifestyles. This is quite contrast to the old Great Britain that lived off of rituals and patterns of the same thing. This is probably the main reason Britain looked down on America. America was changing rapidly and Britain did not approve. John Adam's quote on "Revolution of the Mind" is something I find so true. The harsh communication among the men of Britain and America, the nonsense of all the taxing, the mistreating, every little thing led up and built up to war. Each negative problem between America and Great Britain was a flame that brought up the fire and explosion.
Text Analysis Paragraphs
Circular Letter of the Boston Committee of Correspondence; May 13, 1774.
This letter is from the towns people or maybe the legislator of the colony of Boston. The writers are informing the people about good ol' Great Britain. British military came to take over Boston's control and also punish them for "acting defiant" One example of this includes the East India Tea incident--Boston Tea Party. The main source of these issues is from all the harsh taxing. Boston was suffering because British military was taking over.
Letter from the New York Committee of Fifty-One to the Boston Committee of Correspondence; May 23, 1774
Boston is disgusted with how they are being treated by the British Parliament. Their neighboring colony; New York also believes that Boston is being treated very unjust. The fact that they are colonies next to each other, they realize that they are new, forming communities. New York sees the needs of Boston and steps up and genuinely helps them out. New York tells Boston that they are creating a committee of 51 people. Boston will also have the support of other colonies that surround them. These colonies realized that just because the problem is occuring in Boston, it relates to everyone in the new Americas. If Great Britain is willing to hurt Boston, they will hurt any colony. New York was very proactive by sending Boston this letter. They were also very beneficial because they probably stopped more problems from happening in the future.
Declaration and Resolves of the First Continental Congress.
The British Parliament was claiming they had authority and power over the colonies. With so many rules and laws that were very controlling, colonists had enough. This document shows the colonists voice. Their anger at the unfair British Parliament. They--the colonists-- write out rules and regulations themselves to live by instead of eating and breating by the British parliament.
This letter is from the towns people or maybe the legislator of the colony of Boston. The writers are informing the people about good ol' Great Britain. British military came to take over Boston's control and also punish them for "acting defiant" One example of this includes the East India Tea incident--Boston Tea Party. The main source of these issues is from all the harsh taxing. Boston was suffering because British military was taking over.
Letter from the New York Committee of Fifty-One to the Boston Committee of Correspondence; May 23, 1774
Boston is disgusted with how they are being treated by the British Parliament. Their neighboring colony; New York also believes that Boston is being treated very unjust. The fact that they are colonies next to each other, they realize that they are new, forming communities. New York sees the needs of Boston and steps up and genuinely helps them out. New York tells Boston that they are creating a committee of 51 people. Boston will also have the support of other colonies that surround them. These colonies realized that just because the problem is occuring in Boston, it relates to everyone in the new Americas. If Great Britain is willing to hurt Boston, they will hurt any colony. New York was very proactive by sending Boston this letter. They were also very beneficial because they probably stopped more problems from happening in the future.
Declaration and Resolves of the First Continental Congress.
The British Parliament was claiming they had authority and power over the colonies. With so many rules and laws that were very controlling, colonists had enough. This document shows the colonists voice. Their anger at the unfair British Parliament. They--the colonists-- write out rules and regulations themselves to live by instead of eating and breating by the British parliament.
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
Text Analysis Rubric
Text Analysis Rubric
Purpose:
Develop skills in historical research of primary sources, by extrapolating the arguments and meanings of various historical authors.
Rubric:
1.) Display a reading knowledge of the assignment and take comprehensive notes on the reading
2.) Demonstrate an intelligible understanding of the author’s argument and purpose for writing
3.) Discuss your analysis of the reading in a small-group discussion setting [OR in large group, full-class discussion (according to discretion of instructor).]
For Facilitators:
4.) Lead small-group discussion of assigned reading
5.) Prepare Facilitator prep sheet for group discussion and to submit to instructor at end of class period
6.) Send a follow-up email to the instructor regarding the quality of participation from your small group members.
For Participators:
4.) Participate in small-group discussion of assigned reading
5.) Be prepared to share small-group consensus with the larger class
Facilitator prep sheet
--Who is writing?
--Who is the audience?
--Who do the writers represent?
--What is being said, argued and/or requested?
--How is it being said, argued and/or requested?
--What proof and/or justification is being used to legitimize the request?
Circular Letter of the Boston Committee of Correspondence; May 13, 1774
--Who is writing?
The writers of the Circular Letter of the Boston Committe of Correspndence are the towns people of Boston.
....."it is said that [a] fleet of British ships of war is to block up our harbour until we shall make restitution to the East India Company"
--Who is the audience?
I believe the audience of this document is to the people of Boston. The writers were just average towns people trying to warn everyone else.
..."The single question then is, whether you consider Boston as now suffering in the common cause.."
--Who do the writers represent?
The writers were just average towns people trying to inform everyone else.
sincerely..
"Your friends and fellow countrymen."
--What is being said, argued and/or requested?
The fellow town men of Boston are being informed that their colony has been taken under control by the British military. They are being punished for the East India Tea incident-- The Boston Tea Party that rebeled against the taxes. Because of the colony's defiance,Great Britan wants to punish the men.
Even though they recieved a new British Parliament, they encourage the colonists to still stay strong and believe in the freedom rights they pursue in America.
..."We desire your answer by the bearer; and after assuring you that, not in the least intimidated by this inhumane treatment, we are still determined to maintain to the utmost of our abilities the rights of America, we are, gentlemen,
Your friends and fellow countrymen."
--How is it being said, argued and/or requested?
It is in letter formation clarifying that they have recieved the Act of the British Parliament which is setting down the new rules for Boston.
..."We have just received the copy of an Act of the British Parliament passed in the present session whereby the town of Boston is treated in a manner the most ignominious, cruel, and unjust. "
--What proof and/or justification is being used to legitimize the request?
Proof that is being used to legitimize the request is that throughout the document, they are notifyingthe colonists what the new Act of the British Parliament has in store for Boston.
..."This Act fills the inhabitants with indignation"
..."Their grand object is to divide the colonies"
Purpose:
Develop skills in historical research of primary sources, by extrapolating the arguments and meanings of various historical authors.
Rubric:
1.) Display a reading knowledge of the assignment and take comprehensive notes on the reading
2.) Demonstrate an intelligible understanding of the author’s argument and purpose for writing
3.) Discuss your analysis of the reading in a small-group discussion setting [OR in large group, full-class discussion (according to discretion of instructor).]
For Facilitators:
4.) Lead small-group discussion of assigned reading
5.) Prepare Facilitator prep sheet for group discussion and to submit to instructor at end of class period
6.) Send a follow-up email to the instructor regarding the quality of participation from your small group members.
For Participators:
4.) Participate in small-group discussion of assigned reading
5.) Be prepared to share small-group consensus with the larger class
Facilitator prep sheet
--Who is writing?
--Who is the audience?
--Who do the writers represent?
--What is being said, argued and/or requested?
--How is it being said, argued and/or requested?
--What proof and/or justification is being used to legitimize the request?
Circular Letter of the Boston Committee of Correspondence; May 13, 1774
--Who is writing?
The writers of the Circular Letter of the Boston Committe of Correspndence are the towns people of Boston.
....."it is said that [a] fleet of British ships of war is to block up our harbour until we shall make restitution to the East India Company"
--Who is the audience?
I believe the audience of this document is to the people of Boston. The writers were just average towns people trying to warn everyone else.
..."The single question then is, whether you consider Boston as now suffering in the common cause.."
--Who do the writers represent?
The writers were just average towns people trying to inform everyone else.
sincerely..
"Your friends and fellow countrymen."
--What is being said, argued and/or requested?
The fellow town men of Boston are being informed that their colony has been taken under control by the British military. They are being punished for the East India Tea incident-- The Boston Tea Party that rebeled against the taxes. Because of the colony's defiance,Great Britan wants to punish the men.
Even though they recieved a new British Parliament, they encourage the colonists to still stay strong and believe in the freedom rights they pursue in America.
..."We desire your answer by the bearer; and after assuring you that, not in the least intimidated by this inhumane treatment, we are still determined to maintain to the utmost of our abilities the rights of America, we are, gentlemen,
Your friends and fellow countrymen."
--How is it being said, argued and/or requested?
It is in letter formation clarifying that they have recieved the Act of the British Parliament which is setting down the new rules for Boston.
..."We have just received the copy of an Act of the British Parliament passed in the present session whereby the town of Boston is treated in a manner the most ignominious, cruel, and unjust. "
--What proof and/or justification is being used to legitimize the request?
Proof that is being used to legitimize the request is that throughout the document, they are notifyingthe colonists what the new Act of the British Parliament has in store for Boston.
..."This Act fills the inhabitants with indignation"
..."Their grand object is to divide the colonies"
Essay #1 Reflection
When writing my essay on Bacon's Rebellion, it was quite a big learning experience for me. Growing up in the public school system, we were always taught to force our writing into Jane Schaffer formation. After years of robotic talent--thanks to Mrs. Schaffer, my personal writing skills are not too strong at this point. When writing this essay for Ben and Craig's class, I had to really dig down deep to start writing on my own. Knowing that Craig actually gave us freedom with our essays was exciting yet nerve racking. I knew that with that freedom, came much responsibility.
Over all, I enjoyed writing about Bacon's Rebellion. Today in class during our discussion, Craig and a student were talking about how during the process of writing this essay, we learned all the facts and off of that we had to create a thesis and go back again through the facts to build our foundation. Although this was completely different from how I have been taught, I really enjoyed this process. It was different but I felt strong and organized. Because this process was more work, I felt like I was achieving more. Now I know Bacon's Rebellion like the back of my hand and this is all because of the process we were put through. I completed 3 rough drafts total before writing my final essay. Doing this was very helpful because I was able to fix problems in a very detailed manner. After writing Bacon's Rebellion, I felt very accomplished. I learned so much and it feels nice enjoying school and the assignments given to us. I felt challenged in a way I have never been pushed before.
Over all, I enjoyed writing about Bacon's Rebellion. Today in class during our discussion, Craig and a student were talking about how during the process of writing this essay, we learned all the facts and off of that we had to create a thesis and go back again through the facts to build our foundation. Although this was completely different from how I have been taught, I really enjoyed this process. It was different but I felt strong and organized. Because this process was more work, I felt like I was achieving more. Now I know Bacon's Rebellion like the back of my hand and this is all because of the process we were put through. I completed 3 rough drafts total before writing my final essay. Doing this was very helpful because I was able to fix problems in a very detailed manner. After writing Bacon's Rebellion, I felt very accomplished. I learned so much and it feels nice enjoying school and the assignments given to us. I felt challenged in a way I have never been pushed before.
Saturday, October 25, 2008
The Government is at Fault for Bacon's Rebellion, Not Nathanial Bacon
The time period in which Bacon's Rebellion occurred was a compelling moment in history. This is true no matter what angle it is looked upon. Some say Nathanial Bacon's actions were horrible, while others view him as a hero. Bacon's Rebellion was highly significant because it was an event that interfered with authority, defiance, confrontation, struggle, and evidently, no solution. Although the rebellion was officially started by a man named Nathanial Bacon, it is not necessarily his fault. The rebellion was a ripple effect. The downfall of a leader’s disappointment to colonists, led to the effective strength of one colonist taking a stand. Nathanial Bacon had great influence in Virginia. He impelled the lower class to make a difference. He challenged the government to be stronger. He most definitely affected the lifestyles of those in Virginia during that time period. While satisfying the people behind him, he caused a major ruckus for those who despised him. As all these interferences are expressed, they are voiced in such a way that shows the Government of Virginia is clearly at fault for Bacon's Rebellion, not Nathanial Bacon.
During the 17c, William Berkeley was appointed Governor of Virginia by the King of England. It would soon come to be that Governor Berkeley's control of the government would be a major contribution to Bacon's Rebellion. One factor for this is that Governor Berkeley met the needs and satisfactions of the upper class, leaving the lower class--mostly farmers-- out of the picture. When the colonists first arrived to the new Virginian lands, Berkeley allowed his colony to settle on native lands. During the transition into native lands, Berkeley also wanted to befriend the natives, without consulting ahead of time to see exactly what he was getting himself, and his colony into. The colony of Virginia knew nothing about the Natives and their lifestyles. Taking land from these people, then trying to become friends with them was not the smartest action Berkeley lead his colonists to. Maybe Berkeley was doing what he thought was best for his colony, but poor decision making came from the fact that Berkeley was new to the New World, just like all the colonists, allowing him to make naive adjustments.
As the colonist settled to the new lands, so did conflict. Problems from petty to serious matters between the natives and colonists commonly resulted in murder “...I am sure if the Indian were not cowards, they might have destroyed all the upper plantations and killed all the people upon them” (Doc #9). The horrible murders and events brought the colonist to their leader, Governor Berkeley. They went to him for help and guidance against the natives hoping for an answer; for a stop to the madness. Unfortunately, Berkeley did just the opposite for the needs of his people. Instead of stepping up as a leader, Berkeley merely embraced the Natives for trading matters "The colonial governor was making a good profit from trading with the Indians, and was not willing to disrupt that business by triggering open war (Virginiaplaces.org). Selfishly more concerned with the economy of Virginia, than the innocent lives of people is visibly what Berkeley was choosing. Governor Berkeley made poor decisions while serving the colony of Virginia“The Governor much their friend, that he would not suffer any body to hurt one of the Indians, and he would be very much concerned for the loss of his Overseer...” (Doc #9) His people were simply unprotected against the Indians. There were wars every day between the colonists and the Indians. While this occurred on a daily basis, Governor Berkeley was taking no action. This put the colonists in a position to continuously get hurt. “The unsatisfied People finding themselves still liable to the Indian cruelties…” (Doc #16). Complaint after complaint, he finally made little effort. To make an appearance of attempt, Governor Berkeley came up with a “solution”. Claiming to help end the acts of destruction, his response was to vaguely build forts for protection “What care the Assembly took to prevent these massacres was only to build forts at the heads of each river and on the frontiers and confines of the country…” (Doc#16). This did no good, for the Indians were not as inexperienced as Berkeley thought. In fact, the Indians were able to dominate the forts that were solemnly made to put them down. Putting forts up only at the heads of rivers and frontiers made the colonists look silly and foolish.
During this time period, there were basically two types of social rank. The upper class--usually made up of rich plantation owners, and the lower class that included indentured servants and necessitous farmers. Governor Berkeley favored the higher rank in the social class as they greatly admired him. For obvious reasons, it was more satisfactory to please the people with wealth. The people of the lower class were not being heard nor being reassured of their needs from the leadership of the colony. This made many lower class men furious, causing an up roar of rebellious men “Bacon’s Rebellion brought together groups from the lower classes. They were angry too—mostly about the huge gap between the rich and poor in Virginia” (Zinn, pg. 36). When Berkeley received a complaint from a lower class colonist, Nathanial Bacon, it would not be the last time Berkeley would have an encounter with him. Bacon was upset because natives had killed his friend and servant. When feeling no help from the Governor, Bacon became even more upset. Little did Berkeley know, sitting back and choosing to ignore the people's cry for help, would give Bacon the authority to pass Berkeley up for revenge and power “The frontiersmen felt that the colonial government had let them down…They were angry and they weren’t the only ones” (Zinn pg. 36)
Nathanial Bacon had many men that that completely agreed with him, giving him strong support “In 1676, these unhappy Virginians found a leader in Nathanial Bacon” (Zinn pg. 37) Bacon took advantage of this and was able to become a leader in the House of Burgess's. Nathanial Bacon had passion in what he was pursuing. He cared deeply about his rights and fighting for what he believed in. Even though the leaders were against him, he kept pushing. Bacon literally got his motivation from the fact that people were against him. His desire came from having no response from the government, no response for a problem that needed to be solved immediately. “They elected Bacon to the colonial government, called the House of Burgess's…Bacon was ready to send armed militias or armed groups of citizens to fight the Indians”(Zinn pg.37) The mediocre men of Virginia were very complimentary to Bacon because they felt like someone took a chance to be a leader that was on their side. The great rebel's actions were altogether opposite of the Governor's. Governor Berkeley has no affection for the lower class as opposed to the upper class. The trifling governor intentionally pushed away the community of people that needed him the most. That is where Nathanial Bacon is most successful. The people looked up to him because he came and cleaned up after Governor Berkeley's messy tactics for taking care of the great Virginia colony.
Coming to the New World was opening the door to endless opportunity. Although the colony was not even a country or a nation yet, freedom was everywhere. Freedom was throughout laws and rules. Freedom was the colonist coming to the New World to start a fresh beginning. Bacon stood up for what he believed and broke through for rights; for freedom. He wanted to be noticed, to be heard and he very well accomplished that. By doing so, he set his stone in history. This is carried throughout each generation. A strong representation of this is going on today is strikes. Whether it’s for businesses, politics, laws, or just any given right, people have the opportunity to go on strike. The fact that people have the freedom to strike against something they don't agree with is gratifying. When communities of people go on strike, it is powerful. Their voices are heard and they have the ability to make change to a great extent. Going on strike is a form of rebellion against the rules and laws regulated. Just like Bacon’s Rebellion, Nathanial Bacon went against the rules. This event in history has been one link in the chain to why our wonderful country is known for its independence and freedom to this day.
It is truly sad that within communities, there are sides you have to chose to live by. The colony of Virginia was a crisp, new environment, yet people were already divided by rich and poor. Nathanial Bacon was shunned by most just because he was reaching out past the lower class. In most cases for history events, the heroes were rejected in their lives. When looking back on heroes, or simply people that are remembered for making a difference, is when all truth unfolds. The greatness of looking at Bacon's Rebellion from a bird's eye view, hundreds of years later, is very beneficial. Being able to see all of the Rebel's work gives a great aspect of how Nathanial Bacon made a change. Even though Nathanial Bacon was greatly looked down upon from the Government of Virginia and the upper class of his generation, Bacon made a difference. He fought for what needed to be done in his colony against the natives. Nathanial Bacon was definitely noticed and over all, and proved distinction in history.
Although Governor Berkeley does not get as much praise as Nathanial Bacon, he is a major reason for why Bacon's Rebellion is studied throughout history. Governor Berkeley gave Nathanial Bacon something to do; something to stand against. These men were both powerful because they challenged each other's weaknesses and strengths. The Government is at fault for Bacon's Rebellion because they chose to ignore red flags. If Governor Berkeley would have compassionately answered the request of his lower class, then Bacon would have not created the rebellion, with hundreds of men behind him. The outcome shows the strong rebel had to be defiant in order for lives to be protected in the lower class. The fate of this rebellion clearly represents the government of Virginia was sincerely ignorant.
Thursday, October 23, 2008
revised rough draft #3
The performances of Bacon's Rebellion were a significant time in history. This is true no matter what angle you chose to look at it from. Bacon's Rebellion was highly significant because it was an event that interfered with authority, defiance, confrontation, struggle, and evidently, no solution. Although the rebellion was officially started by a man named Nathanial Bacon, it is not necessarily his fault. The rebellion was a ripple effect. The downfall of a leader’s disappointment to colonists, led to the effective strength of one colonist taking a stand. Some say that Nathanial Bacon’s actions were wrong, while part say otherwise. From any way it is looked at, Nathanial Bacon had great influence in Virginia. He impelled the lower class to make a difference. He challenged the government to be stronger. He most definitely affected the lifestyles of those in Virginia during that time period. While satisfying the people behind him, he caused a major ruckus for those who despised him. As all these interferences will be expressed throughout the essay, they are voiced in such a way that shows the Government of Virginia is clearly at fault for Bacon's Rebellion, not Nathanial Bacon.ADD MORE
During the 17c, William Berkeley was appointed Governor of Virginia by the King of England. It would soon come to be that Governor Berkeley's control of the government would be a major contribution to Bacon's Rebellion. One factor for this is that Governor Berkeley met the needs and satisfactions of the upper class, leaving the lower class--mostly farmers-- out of the picture. When the colonists first arrived to the new Virginian lands, Berkeley allowed his colony to settle on native lands. While moving to native lands, Berkeley also wanted to befriend the natives, without consulting ahead of time to see exactly what he was getting himself, and his colony into. The colony of Virginia knew nothing about the Natives and their lifestyles. Taking land from these people, then trying to become friends with them was not the smartest action Berkeley performed. Of course Berkeley was doing what he thought was best for his colony, but poor decision making came from the fact that Berkeley was new to the New World, just like all the colonists, allowing him to make naive adjustments.
As the colonist settled to the new lands, so did conflict. Problems from petty to serious matters between the natives and colonists commonly resulted in murder “..I am sure if the Indian were not cowards, they might have destroyed all the upper plantations and killed all the people upon them” (Doc #9). The horrible murders and events brought the colonist to their leader, Governor Berkeley. They went to him for help and guidance against the natives hoping for an answer; for a stop to the madness. Unfortunately, Berkeley did just the opposite for the needs of his people. Instead of stepping up as a leader, Berkeley merely embraced the Natives for trading matters “The Governor much their friend, that he would not suffer any body to hurt one of the Indians, and he would be very much concerned for the loss of his Overseer...” (Doc #9) Selfishly more concerned with the economy of Virginia, than the innocent lives of people is visibly what Berkeley was choosing. Governor Berkeley made poor decisions while serving the colony of Virginia. His people were simply unprotected against the Indians. There were wars every day between the colonists and the Indians. While this occurred on a daily basis, Governor Berkeley was taking no action. This put the colonists in a position to continuously get hurt. “The unsatisfied People finding themselves still liable to the Indian cruelties…”(Doc #16). Complaint after complaint, he finally made little effort. To make an appearance of attempt, Governor Berkeley came up with a “solution”. Claiming to help end the acts of destruction, his response was to vaguely build forts for protection “What care the Assembly took to prevent these massacres was only to build forts at the heads of each river and on the frontiers and confines of the country…”(Doc#16). This did no good, for the Indians weren’t as inexperienced as Berkeley thought. In fact, the Indians were able to dominate the forts that were solemnly made to put them down. Putting forts up only at the heads of rivers and frontiers made the colonists look silly and foolish. During this time period, there were basically two types of social rank. The upper class--usually made up of rich plantation owners, and the lower class that included indentured servants and necessitous farmers. Governor Berkeley favored the higher rank in the social class as they greatly admired him. For obvious reasons, it was more satisfactory to please the people with wealth. The people of the lower class were not being heard nor being reassured of their needs from the leadership of the colony. This made many lower class men furious, causing an up roar of rebellious men “Bacon’s Rebellion brought together groups from the lower classes. They were angry too—mostly about the huge gap between the rich and poor in Virginia” (Zinn, pg. 36) One man that stands the test of all the lower class was the great Nathanial Bacon.
When Berkeley received a complaint from the colonist, Nathanial Bacon, it would not be the last time Berkeley would have an encounter with him. Bacon was upset because natives had killed his friend and servant. When feeling no help from the Governor, Bacon became even more upset. Little did Berkeley know, sitting back and choosing to ignore the people's cry for help, would give Bacon the authority to pass Berkeley up for revenge and power “The frontiersmen felt that the colonial government had let them down…They were angry and they weren’t the only ones” (Zinn pg. 36) Nathanial Bacon had many men that that completely agreed with him, giving him strong support “In 1676, these unhappy Virginians found a leader in Nathanial Bacon” (Zinn pg. 37) Bacon took advantage of this and was able to become a leader in the House of Burgesses. Nathanial Bacon had passion in what he was pursuing. He cared deeply about his rights and fighting for what he believed in. Even though the leaders were against him, he kept pushing. Bacon actually got his motivation from the fact that people were against him. His desire came from having no response from the government, no response for a problem that needed to be solved immediately. “They elected Bacon to the colonial government, called the House of Burgesses…Bacon was ready to send armed militias or armed groups of citizens to fight the Indians”(Zinn pg.37) The mediocre men of Virginia were very complimentary to Bacon because they felt like someone took a chance as a leader that was on their side.
Coming to the New World was opening the door to endless opportunity. Although the colony was not even a country or a nation yet, freedom was everywhere. Freedom was throughout laws and rules. Freedom was the colonist coming to the New World to start a fresh beginning. Bacon stood up for what he believed and broke through for rights; for freedom. He wanted to be noticed, to be heard and he very well accomplished that. By doing so, he set his stone in history. This is carried throughout each generation. A strong representation of this is going on today is strikes. Whether it’s for businesses, politics, laws, or just any given right, people have the opportunity to go on strike. The fact that people have the freedom to strike against something they don't agree with is gratifying. When communities of people go on strike, it is powerful. Their voices are heard and they have the ability to make change to a great extent. Going on strike is a form of rebellion against the rules and laws regulated. Just like Bacon’s Rebellion, Nathanial Bacon went against the rules. This event in history has been one link in the chain to why our wonderful country is known for its independence and freedom to this day.
Even though Nathanial Bacon was greatly looked down upon from the Government of Virginia and the upper class of his generation, Bacon made a difference. He fought for what needed to be done in his colony against the natives. Nathanial Bacon was definitely noticed and over all, and proved distinction in history. ADDMORE
-need more facts
-citations
-backup to hypothesis
During the 17c, William Berkeley was appointed Governor of Virginia by the King of England. It would soon come to be that Governor Berkeley's control of the government would be a major contribution to Bacon's Rebellion. One factor for this is that Governor Berkeley met the needs and satisfactions of the upper class, leaving the lower class--mostly farmers-- out of the picture. When the colonists first arrived to the new Virginian lands, Berkeley allowed his colony to settle on native lands. While moving to native lands, Berkeley also wanted to befriend the natives, without consulting ahead of time to see exactly what he was getting himself, and his colony into. The colony of Virginia knew nothing about the Natives and their lifestyles. Taking land from these people, then trying to become friends with them was not the smartest action Berkeley performed. Of course Berkeley was doing what he thought was best for his colony, but poor decision making came from the fact that Berkeley was new to the New World, just like all the colonists, allowing him to make naive adjustments.
As the colonist settled to the new lands, so did conflict. Problems from petty to serious matters between the natives and colonists commonly resulted in murder “..I am sure if the Indian were not cowards, they might have destroyed all the upper plantations and killed all the people upon them” (Doc #9). The horrible murders and events brought the colonist to their leader, Governor Berkeley. They went to him for help and guidance against the natives hoping for an answer; for a stop to the madness. Unfortunately, Berkeley did just the opposite for the needs of his people. Instead of stepping up as a leader, Berkeley merely embraced the Natives for trading matters “The Governor much their friend, that he would not suffer any body to hurt one of the Indians, and he would be very much concerned for the loss of his Overseer...” (Doc #9) Selfishly more concerned with the economy of Virginia, than the innocent lives of people is visibly what Berkeley was choosing. Governor Berkeley made poor decisions while serving the colony of Virginia. His people were simply unprotected against the Indians. There were wars every day between the colonists and the Indians. While this occurred on a daily basis, Governor Berkeley was taking no action. This put the colonists in a position to continuously get hurt. “The unsatisfied People finding themselves still liable to the Indian cruelties…”(Doc #16). Complaint after complaint, he finally made little effort. To make an appearance of attempt, Governor Berkeley came up with a “solution”. Claiming to help end the acts of destruction, his response was to vaguely build forts for protection “What care the Assembly took to prevent these massacres was only to build forts at the heads of each river and on the frontiers and confines of the country…”(Doc#16). This did no good, for the Indians weren’t as inexperienced as Berkeley thought. In fact, the Indians were able to dominate the forts that were solemnly made to put them down. Putting forts up only at the heads of rivers and frontiers made the colonists look silly and foolish. During this time period, there were basically two types of social rank. The upper class--usually made up of rich plantation owners, and the lower class that included indentured servants and necessitous farmers. Governor Berkeley favored the higher rank in the social class as they greatly admired him. For obvious reasons, it was more satisfactory to please the people with wealth. The people of the lower class were not being heard nor being reassured of their needs from the leadership of the colony. This made many lower class men furious, causing an up roar of rebellious men “Bacon’s Rebellion brought together groups from the lower classes. They were angry too—mostly about the huge gap between the rich and poor in Virginia” (Zinn, pg. 36) One man that stands the test of all the lower class was the great Nathanial Bacon.
When Berkeley received a complaint from the colonist, Nathanial Bacon, it would not be the last time Berkeley would have an encounter with him. Bacon was upset because natives had killed his friend and servant. When feeling no help from the Governor, Bacon became even more upset. Little did Berkeley know, sitting back and choosing to ignore the people's cry for help, would give Bacon the authority to pass Berkeley up for revenge and power “The frontiersmen felt that the colonial government had let them down…They were angry and they weren’t the only ones” (Zinn pg. 36) Nathanial Bacon had many men that that completely agreed with him, giving him strong support “In 1676, these unhappy Virginians found a leader in Nathanial Bacon” (Zinn pg. 37) Bacon took advantage of this and was able to become a leader in the House of Burgesses. Nathanial Bacon had passion in what he was pursuing. He cared deeply about his rights and fighting for what he believed in. Even though the leaders were against him, he kept pushing. Bacon actually got his motivation from the fact that people were against him. His desire came from having no response from the government, no response for a problem that needed to be solved immediately. “They elected Bacon to the colonial government, called the House of Burgesses…Bacon was ready to send armed militias or armed groups of citizens to fight the Indians”(Zinn pg.37) The mediocre men of Virginia were very complimentary to Bacon because they felt like someone took a chance as a leader that was on their side.
Coming to the New World was opening the door to endless opportunity. Although the colony was not even a country or a nation yet, freedom was everywhere. Freedom was throughout laws and rules. Freedom was the colonist coming to the New World to start a fresh beginning. Bacon stood up for what he believed and broke through for rights; for freedom. He wanted to be noticed, to be heard and he very well accomplished that. By doing so, he set his stone in history. This is carried throughout each generation. A strong representation of this is going on today is strikes. Whether it’s for businesses, politics, laws, or just any given right, people have the opportunity to go on strike. The fact that people have the freedom to strike against something they don't agree with is gratifying. When communities of people go on strike, it is powerful. Their voices are heard and they have the ability to make change to a great extent. Going on strike is a form of rebellion against the rules and laws regulated. Just like Bacon’s Rebellion, Nathanial Bacon went against the rules. This event in history has been one link in the chain to why our wonderful country is known for its independence and freedom to this day.
Even though Nathanial Bacon was greatly looked down upon from the Government of Virginia and the upper class of his generation, Bacon made a difference. He fought for what needed to be done in his colony against the natives. Nathanial Bacon was definitely noticed and over all, and proved distinction in history. ADDMORE
-need more facts
-citations
-backup to hypothesis
Monday, October 20, 2008
Where Do I Stand Politically?
Where Do I Stand Politically?
For one to say they do not have a say in politics, is a political statement in itself...
Growing up with my father, that listened to talk radio on a regular basis, watched news and debates, and having strong political views, I wanted to be just like him and agree with everything he said. Of course that's the typical pattern children follow. But as the years went by and I started to grow up, I am becoming my own adult and personality. Now when I hear talk radio, watch debates, and listen to the news, I have taught myself to listen and learn with a complete open mind. I have taught myself to not be completely biased to my father's views, and by doing this I feel like I benefit myself in many ways.
It all started when we would be driving in the car and my dad would go on and on (literally) about everything that was happening in the country and world. As he told me stories--from his point of view--I realized that I didn't always agree with how he was stating the "facts". Gradually, I would tell him that I did not agree and why, and from there we would have our miniature debates. I am eternally grateful for this experience in the years of my adolescence.. It pushed me to start forming who I want to be. I have realized how important politics really are and how they are so important to our country. One reason our country is great is because there is people out there that say they have no political views, people who's jobs are dependant upon politics, and all types in between. The fact that our country is diverse and widely ranged in politics is a great experience to live in. The fact that my dad is far right-sided republican is compelling because it opened my eyes to the whole world of politics. I am not saying I am completely opposite from my dad's views because most of the time I tend to agree with what he is saying. But now that I am older, I see that his views are not the only views to live by. I take advantage of our freedom in this country and I will also take advantage of forming my own political views.
This being said, I don't exactly know where I stand politically but I am always open to learning and I am truly enjoying every moment of it.
For one to say they do not have a say in politics, is a political statement in itself...
Growing up with my father, that listened to talk radio on a regular basis, watched news and debates, and having strong political views, I wanted to be just like him and agree with everything he said. Of course that's the typical pattern children follow. But as the years went by and I started to grow up, I am becoming my own adult and personality. Now when I hear talk radio, watch debates, and listen to the news, I have taught myself to listen and learn with a complete open mind. I have taught myself to not be completely biased to my father's views, and by doing this I feel like I benefit myself in many ways.
It all started when we would be driving in the car and my dad would go on and on (literally) about everything that was happening in the country and world. As he told me stories--from his point of view--I realized that I didn't always agree with how he was stating the "facts". Gradually, I would tell him that I did not agree and why, and from there we would have our miniature debates. I am eternally grateful for this experience in the years of my adolescence.. It pushed me to start forming who I want to be. I have realized how important politics really are and how they are so important to our country. One reason our country is great is because there is people out there that say they have no political views, people who's jobs are dependant upon politics, and all types in between. The fact that our country is diverse and widely ranged in politics is a great experience to live in. The fact that my dad is far right-sided republican is compelling because it opened my eyes to the whole world of politics. I am not saying I am completely opposite from my dad's views because most of the time I tend to agree with what he is saying. But now that I am older, I see that his views are not the only views to live by. I take advantage of our freedom in this country and I will also take advantage of forming my own political views.
This being said, I don't exactly know where I stand politically but I am always open to learning and I am truly enjoying every moment of it.
Wednesday, October 15, 2008
Attempting my rough draft
Hypothesis: Who is at fault for Bacon's Rebellion?
Thesis:The Government of Virginia is at fault for Bacon's Rebellion, not Nathanial Bacon.
The doings of Bacon's Rebellion was a significant time in history. This is true no matter what angle you chose to look at it from. Bacon's Rebellion was highly significant because it was an event that interfered with authority, defiance, confrontation, hostility, struggle, and evidently, no solution. As all these interferences will be expressed throughout the essay. They are voiced in such a way that shows that the Government of Virginia is clearly at fault for Bacon's Rebellion, not Nathanial Bacon.
During the 17c. William Berkeley was appointed Governor of Virginia by the King of England. It would soon come to be that Governor Berkeley's control of the government would be a major contribution to Bacon's Rebellion. Governor Berkeley met the needs and satisfactions of the upper class, leaving the lower class--mostly farmers-- out of the picture..[insert fact/citation here]. When the colonists first arrived to the new Virginian lands, Berkeley allowed his colony to settle on native lands. While moving to native lands, Berkeley also wanted to befriend the natives, without consulting ahead of time to see exactly what he was getting himself, and his colony into. The colony of Virginia knew nothing about the Natives and their lifestyles. Taking land from these people, then trying to become friends with them was not the smartest action Berkeley performed. [insert fact/citation here]. Of course Berkeley was doing what he thought was best for his colony, but poor decision making came from the fact that Berkeley was new to the New World, just like all the colonists, causing him to make naive adjustments.
As the colonist settled to the new lands, so did conflicts [add fact/citation here] Problems from petty to serious matters between the natives and colonists commonly resulted in murder [add fact/citation here]. The horrible events brought the colonist to their leader, Governor Berkeley. They went to him for help and guidance against the natives hoping for an answer; for a stop to the madness. Unfortunately, Berkeley did just the opposite of the needs for his people. Instead of stepping up as a leader, Berkeley merely embraced the Natives for trading matters [add fact/citation here]. Selfishly more concerned with the economy of Virginia, than the innocent lives of people is what Berkeley was choosing. (((What else was behind Berk's motives to turn the people down? )))
Durng this time period, there was basically two types of social rank. The upper class--usually made up of rich plantation owners, and the lower class that included indentured servants and necessitous farmers. Governor Berkeley favored the higher rank in the social class as they greatly admired him. For obvious reasons, it was more satisfactory to please the people with wealth. The people of the lower class were not being heard nor being reassured of their needs from the leadership of the colony. This made many lower classmen furious, causing an uproar of rebellios men. [add fact/citation here]. One man that stands the test of all the lower class, was the great Nathanial Bacon.
When Berkeley recieved a complaint from a colonist, Nathanial Bacon, it would not be the last time Berkeley would encounter Bacon. Bacon was upset because natives had killed his friend and servant [add fact/citation here] When feeling no help from the Governor, Bacon became even more upset. Little did Berkeley know, sitting back and chosing to ignore the people's cry for help, would give Bacon the authority to pass
how this relates to modern day (do not say "it relates"!!)
Coming to the New World was opening the door to endless opportunity. Although the colony was not even a country or a nation yet, freedom was everywhere. Freedom was throughout laws and rules. Freedom was the colonist coming to the New World to start a new beginning. Bacon stood up for what he believed and broke through for rights; for freedom. He wanted to be noticed, to be heard and he very well accomplished that. By doing so, he set his stone in history. This is carried throughout each generation. This event has been one link in the chain to why our wonderful country is known for its independance and freedom to this day.
Thesis:The Government of Virginia is at fault for Bacon's Rebellion, not Nathanial Bacon.
The doings of Bacon's Rebellion was a significant time in history. This is true no matter what angle you chose to look at it from. Bacon's Rebellion was highly significant because it was an event that interfered with authority, defiance, confrontation, hostility, struggle, and evidently, no solution. As all these interferences will be expressed throughout the essay. They are voiced in such a way that shows that the Government of Virginia is clearly at fault for Bacon's Rebellion, not Nathanial Bacon.
During the 17c. William Berkeley was appointed Governor of Virginia by the King of England. It would soon come to be that Governor Berkeley's control of the government would be a major contribution to Bacon's Rebellion. Governor Berkeley met the needs and satisfactions of the upper class, leaving the lower class--mostly farmers-- out of the picture..[insert fact/citation here]. When the colonists first arrived to the new Virginian lands, Berkeley allowed his colony to settle on native lands. While moving to native lands, Berkeley also wanted to befriend the natives, without consulting ahead of time to see exactly what he was getting himself, and his colony into. The colony of Virginia knew nothing about the Natives and their lifestyles. Taking land from these people, then trying to become friends with them was not the smartest action Berkeley performed. [insert fact/citation here]. Of course Berkeley was doing what he thought was best for his colony, but poor decision making came from the fact that Berkeley was new to the New World, just like all the colonists, causing him to make naive adjustments.
As the colonist settled to the new lands, so did conflicts [add fact/citation here] Problems from petty to serious matters between the natives and colonists commonly resulted in murder [add fact/citation here]. The horrible events brought the colonist to their leader, Governor Berkeley. They went to him for help and guidance against the natives hoping for an answer; for a stop to the madness. Unfortunately, Berkeley did just the opposite of the needs for his people. Instead of stepping up as a leader, Berkeley merely embraced the Natives for trading matters [add fact/citation here]. Selfishly more concerned with the economy of Virginia, than the innocent lives of people is what Berkeley was choosing. (((What else was behind Berk's motives to turn the people down? )))
Durng this time period, there was basically two types of social rank. The upper class--usually made up of rich plantation owners, and the lower class that included indentured servants and necessitous farmers. Governor Berkeley favored the higher rank in the social class as they greatly admired him. For obvious reasons, it was more satisfactory to please the people with wealth. The people of the lower class were not being heard nor being reassured of their needs from the leadership of the colony. This made many lower classmen furious, causing an uproar of rebellios men. [add fact/citation here]. One man that stands the test of all the lower class, was the great Nathanial Bacon.
When Berkeley recieved a complaint from a colonist, Nathanial Bacon, it would not be the last time Berkeley would encounter Bacon. Bacon was upset because natives had killed his friend and servant [add fact/citation here] When feeling no help from the Governor, Bacon became even more upset. Little did Berkeley know, sitting back and chosing to ignore the people's cry for help, would give Bacon the authority to pass
how this relates to modern day (do not say "it relates"!!)
Coming to the New World was opening the door to endless opportunity. Although the colony was not even a country or a nation yet, freedom was everywhere. Freedom was throughout laws and rules. Freedom was the colonist coming to the New World to start a new beginning. Bacon stood up for what he believed and broke through for rights; for freedom. He wanted to be noticed, to be heard and he very well accomplished that. By doing so, he set his stone in history. This is carried throughout each generation. This event has been one link in the chain to why our wonderful country is known for its independance and freedom to this day.
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
THESIS REVISION
Thesis:
The Government of Virginia is at fault for Bacon's Rebellion, not Nathanial Bacon.
Background: Bacon's rebellion occured when colonists moved to Native land, causing conflict. When natives were killing colonists and getting away with it by the Governor, Nathanial Bacon started revenge on his own, with many followers.
Body//Discussion
1) Governor Berkeley's control of the Government was a major contribution factor to BR.
a.Berkeley allowed the colonists to move to native lands.
-b.Gov. Berkeley wanted to befriend the natives for trading and economy
--c. This was a huge risk factor for his colonist
2)Govorner Berkeley chose to ignore Red Flags
a. As conflicts arose between the Natives and colonist, as did murder among men.
-b. Because of this, many colonists went to Govorner Berkeley for help and guidance.
--c. Governor Berkeley [intentionally] turned down complaints. This was a major risk to take. I need to research more on the government of Virginia to get a better idea. I need to do specific research on Gov. Berkeley to see what was behind his decisions
3) Nathanial Bacon took action and stood up for what he believed in, going against Gov. Berkeley.
a. When Gov. Berkeley received a complaint from an average colonist named Nathanial Bacon, it would not be the last time he would have to deal with Bacon.
-b. Bacon complained because people around him were getting killed by the natives. When the leadership of his colony would not step in for security of safety, this made Bacon more than furious
--c.Bacon took the leadership into his own hands. He lead average people from the poor to the farmers. Together they rebelled against Gov. Berkeley.
-----although I am maintaining a biased perception, i have many facts/citations to add to this outline. I need to go into more details about Governor Berkeley's view of Nathanial Bacon and so forth.
Reading the packet of documents given to us last week was very beneficial. Because of that packet I was able to form my biased opinion.I have many examples and reasons for why I chose this thesis. Previous documents and articles we have gone over in class are a major factor to use. When reading through the history book, the information given on BR will give me strong citations as well
The Government of Virginia is at fault for Bacon's Rebellion, not Nathanial Bacon.
Background: Bacon's rebellion occured when colonists moved to Native land, causing conflict. When natives were killing colonists and getting away with it by the Governor, Nathanial Bacon started revenge on his own, with many followers.
Body//Discussion
1) Governor Berkeley's control of the Government was a major contribution factor to BR.
a.Berkeley allowed the colonists to move to native lands.
-b.Gov. Berkeley wanted to befriend the natives for trading and economy
--c. This was a huge risk factor for his colonist
2)Govorner Berkeley chose to ignore Red Flags
a. As conflicts arose between the Natives and colonist, as did murder among men.
-b. Because of this, many colonists went to Govorner Berkeley for help and guidance.
--c. Governor Berkeley [intentionally] turned down complaints. This was a major risk to take. I need to research more on the government of Virginia to get a better idea. I need to do specific research on Gov. Berkeley to see what was behind his decisions
3) Nathanial Bacon took action and stood up for what he believed in, going against Gov. Berkeley.
a. When Gov. Berkeley received a complaint from an average colonist named Nathanial Bacon, it would not be the last time he would have to deal with Bacon.
-b. Bacon complained because people around him were getting killed by the natives. When the leadership of his colony would not step in for security of safety, this made Bacon more than furious
--c.Bacon took the leadership into his own hands. He lead average people from the poor to the farmers. Together they rebelled against Gov. Berkeley.
-----although I am maintaining a biased perception, i have many facts/citations to add to this outline. I need to go into more details about Governor Berkeley's view of Nathanial Bacon and so forth.
Reading the packet of documents given to us last week was very beneficial. Because of that packet I was able to form my biased opinion.I have many examples and reasons for why I chose this thesis. Previous documents and articles we have gone over in class are a major factor to use. When reading through the history book, the information given on BR will give me strong citations as well
Monday, October 13, 2008
My Thesis/OUTLINE
Duly noted (or whatevaaa) i understand i need to redo this outline ASAP
i need some extra help & clarification
Mental Vomit: Was it only Bacon's fault for the Rebellion? Although the Rebellion was started by one man, this is a conflict that affected anyone and everyone. The governor is there for his' people. He is suppose to be there to make the colony better. Instead, he stood up for the "enemy"; the Native Americans. They were killing the the colonists of Virginia, harmful in several ways. Governor Berkeley did not take any action against this.
Hypothesis : Who is at fault for Bacon's rebellion?
Thesis: The government is at fault for Bacon's Rebellion, not Nathaniel Bacon
BODY:
IV. Who's fault is Bacon's rebellion
- ((article support))Bacon was mad b/c Indians killing colonists
-Bacon reported to G. Berk what was happening
-Bacon's complaint was not the first -- very important
-G. Berk ignored Bacon's complaint (as well as everyone else's)
-Made Bacon furious b/c Indians getting away w/murder, isn't right
-although [argumentative] that colonist were killing Indians as well.
-Because Indians and colonist were killing each other, this would have to be solved eventually
-G. Berk ignored Bacon's complains (as well as everyone else') --->
-Set Bacon off and he took the major issues into his own hands
-Basically this is a review of the summary of Bacon's rebellion
I will elaborate on certain points such as Bacon complaining to the governor as well as many other people complaining about the Indians killing their fellow colonists.
--I also need to stress the fact that G. Berk chose to ignore the complaints, chose to befriend the natives. when he should have been standing up for his people; his colony.
-Trade w/ Natives was not worth G. Berk's colonists dying.
-Bacon felt like it was the right thing to do-- to fight the Natives himself since his leader selfishly chose to let it go by.
-Bacon's rebellion was not necessarily his fault. He had many, many followers that appreciated him stepping up to the plate because the governor simply let them down
--there is many situations that are significant to Bacon's rebellion. The world goes on and sometimes actions going on are wrong. For there to be change for the right thing, takes effort. It takes getting out of that comfort zone, to push until justified.
-That's exactly what Bacon did, he pushed, he pulled, and he made a dent in history.
i need some extra help & clarification
Mental Vomit: Was it only Bacon's fault for the Rebellion? Although the Rebellion was started by one man, this is a conflict that affected anyone and everyone. The governor is there for his' people. He is suppose to be there to make the colony better. Instead, he stood up for the "enemy"; the Native Americans. They were killing the the colonists of Virginia, harmful in several ways. Governor Berkeley did not take any action against this.
Hypothesis : Who is at fault for Bacon's rebellion?
Thesis: The government is at fault for Bacon's Rebellion, not Nathaniel Bacon
BODY:
IV. Who's fault is Bacon's rebellion
- ((article support))Bacon was mad b/c Indians killing colonists
-Bacon reported to G. Berk what was happening
-Bacon's complaint was not the first -- very important
-G. Berk ignored Bacon's complaint (as well as everyone else's)
-Made Bacon furious b/c Indians getting away w/murder, isn't right
-although [argumentative] that colonist were killing Indians as well.
-Because Indians and colonist were killing each other, this would have to be solved eventually
-G. Berk ignored Bacon's complains (as well as everyone else') --->
-Set Bacon off and he took the major issues into his own hands
-Basically this is a review of the summary of Bacon's rebellion
I will elaborate on certain points such as Bacon complaining to the governor as well as many other people complaining about the Indians killing their fellow colonists.
--I also need to stress the fact that G. Berk chose to ignore the complaints, chose to befriend the natives. when he should have been standing up for his people; his colony.
-Trade w/ Natives was not worth G. Berk's colonists dying.
-Bacon felt like it was the right thing to do-- to fight the Natives himself since his leader selfishly chose to let it go by.
-Bacon's rebellion was not necessarily his fault. He had many, many followers that appreciated him stepping up to the plate because the governor simply let them down
--there is many situations that are significant to Bacon's rebellion. The world goes on and sometimes actions going on are wrong. For there to be change for the right thing, takes effort. It takes getting out of that comfort zone, to push until justified.
-That's exactly what Bacon did, he pushed, he pulled, and he made a dent in history.
Friday, October 10, 2008
History quotes response
1. “The definition which the scripture gives us of love is this: ‘Love is the bond of perfection.’ [I]t is a bond or ligament. . . . There is no body but consists of parts and that which each part so contiguous to others as thereby they do mutually participate with each other, both in strength and infirmity, in pleasure and pain. . . . Christ and his church make one body. The several parts of this body, considered apart before they were united, were disproportionate and as much disordering as so many contrary qualities or elements, [however, when united], it is become the most perfect and best proportioned body in the world[.]”
Response: When the people of the church work together, they create a strong community. People become spiritually closer to God when helping each other out. Politically they work together instead of being ruled by one leader. As the body requires hundred of different parts to function, so do the people as a body of Christ; everyone does their part.
2. “Whatsoever we did or ought to have done when we lived in England, the same must we do, and more also, where we go.”
Response: They were all colonist from England but they wanted something new and different. The colonist reformed England into New England, changing and reforming for the better.
3. “Thus stands the cause between God and us. We are entered into covenant with him for this work. We have taken out a commission, the Lord hath given us leave to draw our own articles. We have professed to enterprise these actions . . . . Now if the Lord shall please to hear us, and bring us in peace to the place we desire, then hath he ratified this covenant and sealed our commission, [and] will expect a strict performance of the articles contained in it.”
Response: They felt like it was guidance from God to lead a new colonization. God was expecting the people to abide by their own, strong, religious faith.
4. “[W]hen he shall make us a praise and glory that men shall say of succeeding [colonies], ‘the Lord make it like that of New England.’ For we must consider that we shall be as a city upon a hill. The eyes of all people are upon us[.]”
Response: "City Upon A Hill" -- leaders that people look up to as an example to live by. They learned to adjust to a new way of living; looking upon a hill for trust and guidance.
Response: When the people of the church work together, they create a strong community. People become spiritually closer to God when helping each other out. Politically they work together instead of being ruled by one leader. As the body requires hundred of different parts to function, so do the people as a body of Christ; everyone does their part.
2. “Whatsoever we did or ought to have done when we lived in England, the same must we do, and more also, where we go.”
Response: They were all colonist from England but they wanted something new and different. The colonist reformed England into New England, changing and reforming for the better.
3. “Thus stands the cause between God and us. We are entered into covenant with him for this work. We have taken out a commission, the Lord hath given us leave to draw our own articles. We have professed to enterprise these actions . . . . Now if the Lord shall please to hear us, and bring us in peace to the place we desire, then hath he ratified this covenant and sealed our commission, [and] will expect a strict performance of the articles contained in it.”
Response: They felt like it was guidance from God to lead a new colonization. God was expecting the people to abide by their own, strong, religious faith.
4. “[W]hen he shall make us a praise and glory that men shall say of succeeding [colonies], ‘the Lord make it like that of New England.’ For we must consider that we shall be as a city upon a hill. The eyes of all people are upon us[.]”
Response: "City Upon A Hill" -- leaders that people look up to as an example to live by. They learned to adjust to a new way of living; looking upon a hill for trust and guidance.
Thursday, October 9, 2008
Bacon's Rebellion #2
Bacon's Rebellion
The Rebellion started by Nathaniel Bacon was not just an act of defiance, but a trade mark for a revolution and a significant time in history. After Natives has killed his friend, Bacon was furious and wanted revenge for the many common killings natives got away with. Puglishi states in his article "...but the immediate excuse for the uprising was the presence of some Doeg and Susqehannick Indians raiding parties on the frontier"(Puglishi). Bacon's encounter with Governor Berkeley of Virginia to settle the Natives set off several events.Governor Berkeley did not respond to Bacon as he pleaded, uprising a challenge in Bacon; Rebellion. His rebellion brought together many of the lower class of the Virginia people and with their vote, Bacon was able to join leadership in the House of Burgesses to pursue his fight against the natives and against the Governor..."As a result, Nathanial Bacon, a relatively new planter in the colony arose to lead an exta-legal band of over 500 men, without commission" .
Bacon started strong with success in the government, stating an act of independence to fight the natives. But this was not beneficial for Governor Berkeley because this would cause a war between the colony and the natives, and would weaken Virginia if the colony were to start splitting up. Governor took action and fought to take Bacon out of power until it happened. Although Bacon was removed from the House of Burgess, the damage was already done. Bacon set a trademark in history that was an action closer to fighting for rights, fighting for what one--or many-- believe in.
The Rebellion started by Nathaniel Bacon was not just an act of defiance, but a trade mark for a revolution and a significant time in history. After Natives has killed his friend, Bacon was furious and wanted revenge for the many common killings natives got away with. Puglishi states in his article "...but the immediate excuse for the uprising was the presence of some Doeg and Susqehannick Indians raiding parties on the frontier"(Puglishi). Bacon's encounter with Governor Berkeley of Virginia to settle the Natives set off several events.Governor Berkeley did not respond to Bacon as he pleaded, uprising a challenge in Bacon; Rebellion. His rebellion brought together many of the lower class of the Virginia people and with their vote, Bacon was able to join leadership in the House of Burgesses to pursue his fight against the natives and against the Governor..."As a result, Nathanial Bacon, a relatively new planter in the colony arose to lead an exta-legal band of over 500 men, without commission" .
Bacon started strong with success in the government, stating an act of independence to fight the natives. But this was not beneficial for Governor Berkeley because this would cause a war between the colony and the natives, and would weaken Virginia if the colony were to start splitting up. Governor took action and fought to take Bacon out of power until it happened. Although Bacon was removed from the House of Burgess, the damage was already done. Bacon set a trademark in history that was an action closer to fighting for rights, fighting for what one--or many-- believe in.
Wednesday, October 8, 2008
National College Fair
The purpose of this worksheet/assignment is to assist in making your day at the National College Fair as productive as possible. Your journey of exploring post-secondary educational programs and career options will be a life-long one, but it is critically important at this time. Please complete each section below. Your responses are to be submitted to Terry by Oct. 9th.
We suggest that you use the following questions as an interview guide, but certainly ask whatever questions you like: What is the average class size for freshman classes, as well as upper division? How would they describe the relationship between students and instructors at their college? Does their university place a greater emphasis on research or on teaching? What are their policies and procedures relative to financial aide, Scholarships, work-study, etc.? What internship, cooperative-education, and foreign study opportunities are available to undergraduate students? What major is their college best known for? What are the transfer policies and admissions standards for their college, including college testing such as SAT and/or ACT? How would they describe student life on their campus and in the local community?
1) To gain a broad perspective relative to the different types of colleges, campuses, and programs, provide the name and a brief description of the following: (Do not hesitate to explore colleges outside the Northwest states, do not use the same college twice, and do not simply list information available on their website.)
A public college:
** The University of Washington
I would really love to stay local. I will probably change my mind about a hundred times but I feel really blessed to live so close to such a great school with much potential. The UW is known world wide with much diversity and beyond many opportunities. They also have a great pre-medical program which I am really hoping to get into.
A private college:
**Whitworth University
Definitely one of my top choices. A private Christian college that I would love to be apart of. They have major Christian heritage, very encouraging to know. They also have a great program to take semesters in other countries through the university which is just awesome because I have a passion to travel all over the world. (also pre-med program)
A rural college:
**Chapman University
Going out of state would be an exciting experience. Orange County, California is a great area and after researching Chapman University, I got a very good perspective of the options at Chapman. Before getting into the medical field, I think getting my teacher's degree before hand would be very beneficial. At the college fair I asked Chapman if they would accept running start credits. They said that if you send separate transcripts (high school transcript & highline transcript) they are able to transfer and accept the credits.
A traditional large university:
**University of Central Florida
6th largest University in the nation. Has several ++ regional campuses. Very detailed website and booklet from the college fair. Has 9 pre-professional programs including Pre-Medical.
I also have family close by the college that I'm very close to and living near them while going to college is a huge benefit.
A small alternative college:
**Renton Technical College
Again, somewhat local, and small. I noticed that studies are taken by quarters. The quarters are quite short and what you major in, you get it done in a shorter amount of time. They have a whole pre-med program in itself that was very thorough
2) Select a college major that you might be interested in pursuing.
**Nursing/RN program
or Teaching degree
Find three colleges that are known to offer quality programs in that major. You may choose only one of the three colleges from within the state of Washington. Briefly describe what impressed you about each of these colleges. Then finally, describe how your overall educational experience might differ if you were to choose one college over the others. In making your comparisons, be sure to consider some the issues raised in the “suggested questions” above. (You probably should do some research on this before attending the Fair)
The University of Washington
--Typical of course but I really like how they are known for their medical field. I know alot about it because several of my family members have graduated from UW through the medical field as doctors.
Pacific University
-- They have school of Physical Therapy and Occupational Health. The health profession has many opportunities and its a great liberal college.
Holy Cross
--Has a whole separate field of Pre Medical. They also will accept running start credits.
3) Attend at least one of the workshops during your time at the Fair. Briefly describe the content of the workshop and evaluate the information received.
--I attended a Financial Workshop. It was very informative and I learned alot. They talked about grants, scholarships, qualifications of work study, loans, and showed us many examples of these so I was able to get a strong understanding.
4) Write a personal evaluation of your experience of attending the National College Fair. Share whatever thoughts you have, but be sure to include a discussion of the following:
I thought going to the College fair was a great experience and I am greatful I went. It opened up my mind in so many ways. Seeing that I have endless opportunities to reach my goals in life is just awesome and gives me motivation to continue to strive for the best in life.
We suggest that you use the following questions as an interview guide, but certainly ask whatever questions you like: What is the average class size for freshman classes, as well as upper division? How would they describe the relationship between students and instructors at their college? Does their university place a greater emphasis on research or on teaching? What are their policies and procedures relative to financial aide, Scholarships, work-study, etc.? What internship, cooperative-education, and foreign study opportunities are available to undergraduate students? What major is their college best known for? What are the transfer policies and admissions standards for their college, including college testing such as SAT and/or ACT? How would they describe student life on their campus and in the local community?
1) To gain a broad perspective relative to the different types of colleges, campuses, and programs, provide the name and a brief description of the following: (Do not hesitate to explore colleges outside the Northwest states, do not use the same college twice, and do not simply list information available on their website.)
A public college:
** The University of Washington
I would really love to stay local. I will probably change my mind about a hundred times but I feel really blessed to live so close to such a great school with much potential. The UW is known world wide with much diversity and beyond many opportunities. They also have a great pre-medical program which I am really hoping to get into.
A private college:
**Whitworth University
Definitely one of my top choices. A private Christian college that I would love to be apart of. They have major Christian heritage, very encouraging to know. They also have a great program to take semesters in other countries through the university which is just awesome because I have a passion to travel all over the world. (also pre-med program)
A rural college:
**Chapman University
Going out of state would be an exciting experience. Orange County, California is a great area and after researching Chapman University, I got a very good perspective of the options at Chapman. Before getting into the medical field, I think getting my teacher's degree before hand would be very beneficial. At the college fair I asked Chapman if they would accept running start credits. They said that if you send separate transcripts (high school transcript & highline transcript) they are able to transfer and accept the credits.
A traditional large university:
**University of Central Florida
6th largest University in the nation. Has several ++ regional campuses. Very detailed website and booklet from the college fair. Has 9 pre-professional programs including Pre-Medical.
I also have family close by the college that I'm very close to and living near them while going to college is a huge benefit.
A small alternative college:
**Renton Technical College
Again, somewhat local, and small. I noticed that studies are taken by quarters. The quarters are quite short and what you major in, you get it done in a shorter amount of time. They have a whole pre-med program in itself that was very thorough
2) Select a college major that you might be interested in pursuing.
**Nursing/RN program
or Teaching degree
Find three colleges that are known to offer quality programs in that major. You may choose only one of the three colleges from within the state of Washington. Briefly describe what impressed you about each of these colleges. Then finally, describe how your overall educational experience might differ if you were to choose one college over the others. In making your comparisons, be sure to consider some the issues raised in the “suggested questions” above. (You probably should do some research on this before attending the Fair)
The University of Washington
--Typical of course but I really like how they are known for their medical field. I know alot about it because several of my family members have graduated from UW through the medical field as doctors.
Pacific University
-- They have school of Physical Therapy and Occupational Health. The health profession has many opportunities and its a great liberal college.
Holy Cross
--Has a whole separate field of Pre Medical. They also will accept running start credits.
3) Attend at least one of the workshops during your time at the Fair. Briefly describe the content of the workshop and evaluate the information received.
--I attended a Financial Workshop. It was very informative and I learned alot. They talked about grants, scholarships, qualifications of work study, loans, and showed us many examples of these so I was able to get a strong understanding.
4) Write a personal evaluation of your experience of attending the National College Fair. Share whatever thoughts you have, but be sure to include a discussion of the following:
I thought going to the College fair was a great experience and I am greatful I went. It opened up my mind in so many ways. Seeing that I have endless opportunities to reach my goals in life is just awesome and gives me motivation to continue to strive for the best in life.
Tuesday, October 7, 2008
They Say: Bacon's Rebellion
Bacon's Rebellion
The Rebellion started by Nathaniel Bacon was not just an act of defiance, but a trade mark for a revolution and a significant time in history. After Natives has killed his friend, Bacon was furious and wanted revenge for the many common killings natives got away with.Bacon's encounter with Governor Berkeley of Virginia to settle the Natives set off several events.Governor Berkeley did not respond to Bacon as he pleaded, uprising a challenge in Bacon; Rebellion. His rebellion brought together many of the lower class of the Virginia people and with their vote, Bacon was able to join leadership in the House of Burgesses to pursue his fight against the natives and against the Governor. Bacon started strong with success in the government, stating an act of independence to fight the natives. But this was not beneficial for Governor Berkeley because this would cause a war between the colony and the natives, and would weaken Virginia if the colony were to start splitting up. Governor took action and fought to take Bacon out of power until it happened. Although Bacon was removed from the House of Burgess, the damage was already done. Bacon set a trademark in history that was an action closer to fighting for rights, fighting for what one--or many-- believe in.
Thursday, October 2, 2008
Political Economy of the Body.........
Quote UNO
--After reading this quote, it made me feel like our bodies are like a turtle shell, carrying our minds, spirits, and souls. Protecting our precious gifts. The body does what is required of our demands--or the demands of others. Slaves were forced to do hard labor by their masters. They were pushed passed their comfort zones, treated like property, and meant nothing to the masters but just labor workers. It is what is inside our bodies that is powerful. I say this because if you have the mental motivation, you can do anything. The masters got in the heads of slaves and broke them, taking away rights and respect. The masters forced the slaves to reach their physical potential to do labor...and that's all they did to the slaves. Slaves were not people to masters, they were just property. Because of this, a majority of slaves were not able to put their great potential as human beings elsewhere.
QUOTE DOS
--Putting your body to hard uncomfortable work. Slaves were pushed to their physical ability and farther. They became robotic and treated inhumane. This quote really had me relate back to the first quote. If I was ever put in the same position as a slave, i would probably work and do things that i never imagined i could do as far as worth ethic.
QUOTE TRES
“In the darkest region of the political field the condemned man represents the symmetrical, inverted figure of the king.”
--I feel like this quote was completely different from the last two quotes. It sounds so powerful ; " ...the symmetrical, inverted figure of the king.." I loved that use of words. I think it means that someone of higher rank in society is greatly looked up upon as opposed to someone of lower social rank is looked down upon--inverted. Two people both human with the same human traits but logically differnt in terms of how they are looked at not in the physical relm but in the...emotional relm makes them completely opposite, completely inverted from one another.
--After reading this quote, it made me feel like our bodies are like a turtle shell, carrying our minds, spirits, and souls. Protecting our precious gifts. The body does what is required of our demands--or the demands of others. Slaves were forced to do hard labor by their masters. They were pushed passed their comfort zones, treated like property, and meant nothing to the masters but just labor workers. It is what is inside our bodies that is powerful. I say this because if you have the mental motivation, you can do anything. The masters got in the heads of slaves and broke them, taking away rights and respect. The masters forced the slaves to reach their physical potential to do labor...and that's all they did to the slaves. Slaves were not people to masters, they were just property. Because of this, a majority of slaves were not able to put their great potential as human beings elsewhere.
QUOTE DOS
--Putting your body to hard uncomfortable work. Slaves were pushed to their physical ability and farther. They became robotic and treated inhumane. This quote really had me relate back to the first quote. If I was ever put in the same position as a slave, i would probably work and do things that i never imagined i could do as far as worth ethic.
QUOTE TRES
“In the darkest region of the political field the condemned man represents the symmetrical, inverted figure of the king.”
--I feel like this quote was completely different from the last two quotes. It sounds so powerful ; " ...the symmetrical, inverted figure of the king.." I loved that use of words. I think it means that someone of higher rank in society is greatly looked up upon as opposed to someone of lower social rank is looked down upon--inverted. Two people both human with the same human traits but logically differnt in terms of how they are looked at not in the physical relm but in the...emotional relm makes them completely opposite, completely inverted from one another.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
